Is there an evidence-based argument for embracing an antimicrobial (triclosan)-coated suture technology to reduce the risk for surgical-site infections?: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 23809487
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.008
Is there an evidence-based argument for embracing an antimicrobial (triclosan)-coated suture technology to reduce the risk for surgical-site infections?: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: It has been estimated that 750,000 to 1 million surgical-site infections (SSIs) occur in the United States each year, causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Triclosan-coated sutures were developed as an adjunctive strategy for SSI risk reduction, but a recently published systematic literature review and meta-analysis suggested that no clinical benefit is associated with this technology. However, that study was hampered by poor selection of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and low patient numbers. The current systematic review involves 13 randomized, international RCTs, totaling 3,568 surgical patients.
Methods: A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase/Medline, Cochrane database group (Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Economic Evaluations Database/Database of Health Technology Assessments), and www.clinicaltrials.gov to identify RCTs of triclosan-coated sutures compared with conventional sutures and assessing the clinical effectiveness of antimicrobial sutures to decrease the risk for SSIs. A fixed- and random-effects model was developed, and pooled estimates reported as risk ratio (RR) with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Publication bias was assessed by analyzing a funnel plot of individual studies and testing the Egger regression intercept.
Results: The meta-analysis (13 RCTs, 3,568 patients) found that use of triclosan antimicrobial-coated sutures was associated with a decrease in SSIs in selected patient populations (fixed effect: RR = 0.734; 95% CI: 0.590-0.913; P = .005; random-effect: RR = 0.693; 95% CI: 0.533-0.920; P = .011). No publication bias was detected (Egger intercept test: P = .145).
Conclusion: Decreasing the risk for SSIs requires a multifaceted "care bundle" approach, and this meta-analysis of current, pooled, peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials suggests a clinical effectiveness of antimicrobial-coated sutures (triclosan) in the prevention of SSIs, representing Center for Evidence-Based Medicine level 1a evidence.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the use of triclosan-coated sutures in the prevention of surgical-site infections.Surgery. 2014 Feb;155(2):361-2. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 12. Surgery. 2014. PMID: 24210496 No abstract available.
-
Is there an evidence-based argument for embracing an antimicrobial (triclosan)-coated suture technology to reduce the risk for surgical-site infections? A meta-analysis.Surgery. 2014 Feb;155(2):362-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Nov 14. Surgery. 2014. PMID: 24433775 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of triclosan-coated sutures for reducing risk of surgical site infection in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.J Surg Res. 2016 Mar;201(1):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 23. J Surg Res. 2016. PMID: 26850191 Review.
-
Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection.Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e118-e133. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10445. Epub 2017 Jan 17. Br J Surg. 2017. PMID: 28093723 Review.
-
Triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infections: a meta-analysis.Acta Chir Belg. 2017 Jun;117(3):137-148. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1287396. Epub 2017 Feb 9. Acta Chir Belg. 2017. PMID: 28399780 Review.
-
The Efficacy of Antimicrobial-Coated Sutures for Preventing Incisional Surgical Site Infections in Digestive Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Oct;22(10):1832-1841. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3832-8. Epub 2018 Jun 20. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018. PMID: 29926317
-
Alcoholic chlorhexidine skin preparation or triclosan-coated sutures to reduce surgical site infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomised controlled trials.Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;22(8):1242-1251. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00133-5. Epub 2022 May 26. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 35644158
Cited by
-
The role of antimicrobial sutures in preventing surgical site infection.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Jul;99(6):439-443. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0071. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017. PMID: 28660816 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial laser-activated sealants for combating surgical site infections.Biomater Sci. 2021 May 18;9(10):3791-3803. doi: 10.1039/d0bm01438a. Biomater Sci. 2021. PMID: 33876069 Free PMC article.
-
Chlorhexidine - coated vs non-coated Suture to prevent surgical site infections following laparoscopic abdominal surgery (a prospective, randomized, controlled trial; NOVOTILAC).Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jun 13;410(1):191. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03757-x. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025. PMID: 40512393 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Adherence to evidence-based recommendations for surgical site infection prevention: Results among Italian surgical ward nurses.PLoS One. 2019 Sep 26;14(9):e0222825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222825. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31557219 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for incisional surgical site infection after elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019 Jan 11;3(2):202-208. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12229. eCollection 2019 Mar. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019. PMID: 30923790 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources