Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jul;144(1):57-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.02.026.

Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography

Craig M Minich et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine whether Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions have skeletal or dental asymmetries between the Class II and Class I sides.

Methods: A sample of 54 untreated Angle Class II subdivision patients with pretreatment photos and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans was used. The photos were used to identify the Class II subdivision malocclusion and to record the amount of crowding per quadrant. Landmarks were plotted on each CBCT volume so that direct 3-dimensional measurements could be made to compare the positions and dimensions of the skeletal and dental structures on the Class II side vs the Class I side.

Results: Significant differences were found for 2 skeletal measurements: the position of the maxilla relative to the cranial base, and the mandibular dimension from the mandibular foramen to the mental foramen. Statistically significant dental differences were found for the position of the mandibular first molars and canines in relation to the maxilla and the mandible. Statistically significant differences were found for the maxillary first molars and canines in relation to the mandible.

Conclusions: There were significant skeletal and dental differences between the Class I and Class II sides. The dental asymmetries accounted for about two thirds of the total asymmetry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • The null hypothesis.
    Vitral RW, Campos MJ, Fraga MR. Vitral RW, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Oct;144(4):498-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.010. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013. PMID: 24075653 No abstract available.
  • Authors' response.
    Minich C, Araujo E, Behrents R, Kim KB, Buschang P, Tanaka O. Minich C, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Oct;144(4):499-500. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.08.009. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013. PMID: 24075654 No abstract available.
  • Authors' response.
    Minich C, Araujo E, Behrents R, Kim KB, Buschang P, Tanaka O. Minich C, et al. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):2-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.009. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24373646 No abstract available.
  • Asymmetries evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Li J. Li J. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jan;145(1):2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.11.008. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014. PMID: 24373647 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources