Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;32(1):43.e1-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

Effect of metformin on prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy

Affiliations

Effect of metformin on prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy

Dharam Kaushik et al. Urol Oncol. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Recent studies have shown a relative risk reduction in the incidence of prostate cancer in patients taking metformin. However, there are conflicting findings on the effect of metformin on established cases of prostate cancer. In this study we evaluated the effect of metformin on survival and pathologic outcomes in established prostate cancer.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified 12,052 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1997 and 2010 at Mayo Clinic. Among these, 885 (7.3%) were diabetics, including 323 taking and 562 not taking metformin. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to calculate rates of biochemical recurrence (BCR), systemic progression (SP), and all-cause mortality (ACM). Cox models were used to estimate the metformin hazard ratio (HR) adjusted for clinical and pathologic variables.

Results and conclusions: Median follow-up was 5.1 years. In univariate analysis, metformin HR (95% confidence intervals) was not significant for BCR (1.13 [0.84, 1.52]; P = 0.40), SP (1.37 [0.69, 2.72]; P = 0.37), and ACM (1.32 [0.84, 2.05]; P = 0.23). After adjusting for covariates of interest, the HRs for metformin among diabetics remained nonsignificant for BCR (0.91 [0.67, 1.24]; P = 0.55), SP (0.83 [0.39, 1.74]; P = 0.62); and ACM (1.16 [0.73, 1.86]; P = 0.53). No significant difference was seen between metformin users and nonusers in the final pathologic Gleason score (P = 0.33), stage (P = 0.1), rate of positive surgical margins (P = 0.29), or tumor volume (P = 0.76). Metformin use was not associated with a risk reduction in BCR, SP, or ACM. Besides presenting survival data, our results describing metformin's effect on final pathology are unique.

Keywords: Biochemical recurrence; Disease progression; Metformin; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Survival rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial disclosures and conflict of interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier plot with numbers at risk for cumulative event rate of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier plot with numbers at risk for cumulative event rate of systemic progression after radical prostatectomy
Figure 3
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier plot with numbers at risk for cumulative event rate of all-cause mortality following radical prostatectomy

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–917. - PubMed
    1. Bonovas S, Filioussi K, Tsantes A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2004;47(6):1071–8. - PubMed
    1. Kasper JS, Liu Y, Giovannucci E. Diabetes mellitus and risk of prostate cancer in the health professionals follow-up study. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(6):1398–403. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Waters KM, Henderson BE, Stram DO, Wan P, Kolonel LN, Haiman CA. Association of diabetes with prostate cancer risk in the multiethnic cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169(8):937–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruiter R, Visser LE, van Herk-Sukel MP, et al. Lower risk of cancer in patients on metformin in comparison with those on sulfonylurea derivatives: results from a large population-based follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(1):119–24. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types