Alternative lipid emulsions in the critically ill: a systematic review of the evidence
- PMID: 23812404
- PMCID: PMC4464672
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-2999-4
Alternative lipid emulsions in the critically ill: a systematic review of the evidence
Abstract
Purpose: Parenteral lipid emulsions (LEs) are commonly rich in long-chain triglycerides derived from soybean oil (SO). SO-containing emulsions may promote systemic inflammation and therefore may adversely affect clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that alternative oil-based LEs (SO-sparing strategies) may improve clinical outcomes in critically ill adult patients compared to products containing SO emulsion only. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of parenteral SO-sparing strategies on clinical outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
Methods: We searched computerized databases from 1980 to 2013. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in critically ill adult patients that evaluated SO-sparing strategies versus SO-based LEs in the context of parenteral nutrition.
Results: A total of 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. When the results of these RCTs were statistically aggregated, SO-sparing strategies were associated with clinically important reductions in mortality (risk ratio, RR 0.83; 95 % confidence intervals, CI 0.62, 1.11; P = 0.20), in duration of ventilation (weighted mean difference, WMD -2.57; 95 % CI -5.51, 0.37; P = 0.09), and in ICU length of stay (LOS) (WMD -2.31; 95 % CI -5.28, 0.66; P = 0.13) but none of these differences were statistically significant. SO-sparing strategies had no effect on infectious complications (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.87, 1.46; P = 0.35).
Conclusion: Alternative oil-based LEs may be associated with clinically important reductions in mortality, duration of ventilation, and ICU LOS but lack of statistical precision precludes any clinical recommendations at this time. Further research is warranted to confirm these potential positive treatment effects.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests
The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Vanek VW, Seidner DL, Allen P, Bistrian B, Collier S, Gura K, Miles JM, Valentine CJ, Kochevar M Novel Nutrient Task Force, Intravenous Fat Emulsions Workgroup; and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Board of Directors. A.S.P.E.N. Position Paper: Clinical role for alternative intravenous fat emulsions. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012;27:150–192. - PubMed
-
- Vinnars E, Wilmore D. Jonathan Roads Symposium Papers. History of parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:225–231. - PubMed
-
- Carpentier YA, Dupont IE. Advances in intravenous lipid emulsions. World J Surg. 2000;24:1493–1497. - PubMed
-
- Wanten GJA, Calder P. Immune modulation by parenteral lipid emulsions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1171–1184. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
