Trends in hospital volume and patterns of referral for women with gynecologic cancers
- PMID: 23812455
- PMCID: PMC4607280
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828ec686
Trends in hospital volume and patterns of referral for women with gynecologic cancers
Abstract
Objective: To estimate trends in hospital volume and referral patterns for women with uterine and ovarian cancer.
Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women aged 65 years or older with ovarian and uterine cancer who underwent surgery from 2000 to 2007. "Volume creep," when a greater number of patients undergo surgery at the same hospitals, and "market concentration," when a similar overall number of patients undergo a procedure but at a smaller number of hospitals, were analyzed.
Results: Among 4,522 patients with ovarian cancer, mean hospital volume increased from 3.1 cases during 2000-2001 to 3.4 cases during 2006-2007 (P=.62) suggesting minimal volume creep. Similarly, there was little evidence of market concentration. In 2000-2001, 37.8% of women were treated at the top decile by volume hospitals compared with 41.4% in 2006-2007 (P=.14). In 2006-2007, 201 (63.2%) of the hospitals had an ovarian cancer surgery volume of two or fewer cases. Among 9,908 women with uterine cancer, the mean hospital volume increased slightly from 4.5 in 2000-2001 to 5.4 in 2006-2007 (P=.10). The percentage of patients treated at the top decile by volume of hospitals increased from 40.4% in 2000-2001 to 44.7% in 2006-2007 (P<.001). In 2006-2007, 243 (49.3%) of the hospitals had a uterine cancer surgery volume of two or fewer cases.
Conclusion: There have been only modest changes in the referral patterns of women with ovarian and uterine cancer. A large number of hospitals have a very low procedural volume.
Figures
Comment in
-
Trends in hospital volume and patterns of referral for women with gynecologic cancers: adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):905-906. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a79fd0. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24084554 No abstract available.
-
In reply.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):906-907. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7b774. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24084555 No abstract available.
References
-
- Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1138–44. - PubMed
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128–37. - PubMed
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–27. - PubMed
-
- Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. Jama. 2000;284:3028–35. - PubMed
-
- Lindenauer P. Public reporting and pay-for-performance programs in perioperative medicine: are they meeting their goals? Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76 (Suppl 4):S3–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
