Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;121(6):1226-1234.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182922a17.

Adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care

Affiliations

Adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care

Robert E Bristow et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: To validate National Comprehensive Cancer Network ovarian cancer guideline adherence as a quality process measure associated with improved survival, and to identify structural health care characteristics predictive of adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care.

Methods: Consecutive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2006 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care was defined by stage-appropriate surgical procedures and recommended chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics predictive of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline adherence and ovarian cancer-specific survival.

Results: A total of 13,321 patients were identified. Overall, 37.2% of patients received National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-adherent care. Guideline-adherent care was associated with high-volume hospitals (20 or more cases per year; 50.8% compared with 34.1%; P<.001) and high-volume physicians (10 or more cases per year; 47.6% compared with 34.5%; P<.001). After controlling for other factors, both low-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-2.01) and low-volume physicians (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32) were independently associated with deviation from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. On multivariable survival analysis, nonadherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care was associated with decreased disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.26-1.41). Both low-volume hospitals (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16) and low-volume physicians (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) were associated with decreased disease-specific survival after adjusting for National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-adherent care.

Conclusions: Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for treatment of ovarian cancer is correlated with improved survival and may be a useful process measure of quality cancer care. Ovarian cancer case volume correlates with a higher likelihood of recommended care and improved survival and may be a useful structural quality measure. Increased efforts to concentrate ovarian cancer care are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10–29.
    1. Reade C, Elit L. Trends in gynecologic cancer care in North America. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2012;39:107–29.
    1. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Q 1966;44:166–206.
    1. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJO. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcome? J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:626–32.
    1. Parikh-Patel A, Allen M, Wright WE. Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:539–45.

Publication types