Adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care
- PMID: 23812456
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182922a17
Adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care
Abstract
Objectives: To validate National Comprehensive Cancer Network ovarian cancer guideline adherence as a quality process measure associated with improved survival, and to identify structural health care characteristics predictive of adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care.
Methods: Consecutive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2006 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care was defined by stage-appropriate surgical procedures and recommended chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify characteristics predictive of National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline adherence and ovarian cancer-specific survival.
Results: A total of 13,321 patients were identified. Overall, 37.2% of patients received National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-adherent care. Guideline-adherent care was associated with high-volume hospitals (20 or more cases per year; 50.8% compared with 34.1%; P<.001) and high-volume physicians (10 or more cases per year; 47.6% compared with 34.5%; P<.001). After controlling for other factors, both low-volume hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-2.01) and low-volume physicians (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07-1.32) were independently associated with deviation from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. On multivariable survival analysis, nonadherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline care was associated with decreased disease-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.26-1.41). Both low-volume hospitals (HR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16) and low-volume physicians (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.28) were associated with decreased disease-specific survival after adjusting for National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline-adherent care.
Conclusions: Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for treatment of ovarian cancer is correlated with improved survival and may be a useful process measure of quality cancer care. Ovarian cancer case volume correlates with a higher likelihood of recommended care and improved survival and may be a useful structural quality measure. Increased efforts to concentrate ovarian cancer care are warranted.
Comment in
-
Trends in hospital volume and patterns of referral for women with gynecologic cancers: adherence to treatment guidelines for ovarian cancer as a measure of quality care.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):905-906. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a79fd0. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24084554 No abstract available.
-
In reply.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):907. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7bbac. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24084556 No abstract available.
References
-
- Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:10–29.
-
- Reade C, Elit L. Trends in gynecologic cancer care in North America. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2012;39:107–29.
-
- Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Memorial Fund Q 1966;44:166–206.
-
- Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJO. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcome? J Am Coll Surg 2004;198:626–32.
-
- Parikh-Patel A, Allen M, Wright WE. Validation of self-reported cancers in the California Teachers Study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:539–45.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical