Anaesthesiological support in a cardiac electrophysiology laboratory: a single-centre prospective observational study
- PMID: 23812621
- DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283626095
Anaesthesiological support in a cardiac electrophysiology laboratory: a single-centre prospective observational study
Abstract
Background: Implantation of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has greatly increased during the last decade and anaesthetic management of these patients remains an open question.
Objective: This study describes anaesthetic management and risk factors associated with complications occurring during these procedures.
Design: A single-centre prospective observational study.
Setting: Grenoble University Hospital, France, from May 2010 to October 2010.
Patients: All patients admitted to the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory were included.
Intervention: None.
Main outcome measures: Clinical data, anaesthetic and medical characteristics as well as complications (respiratory or cardiovascular) and treatment were recorded by the anaesthetic nurse at the end of each procedure.
Results: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included, 229 (85%) with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) status of 3 or 4, 103 (38%) with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class of 3 or 4 and 136 (51%) with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%. Two hundred and forty-seven (92%) of the patients underwent deep sedation and 12 (8%) general anaesthesia. Seventy-eight (29%) patients had at least one complication, among whom 21 (27%) had at least one considered as severe. Fifty (19%) of the patients had a respiratory complication and 46 (17%) a cardiovascular complication; the latter was more frequently severe (41 vs. 12%; P=0.001). Lead extraction [odds ratio (OR) 13.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.5 to 53.3; P<0.001], NYHA status of 4 (OR 11.8, 95% CI 1.8 to 74.8; P<0.001), implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) testing by T-wave shock (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.53 to 10.2; P=0.005) and length of procedure (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.004 to 1.031; P=0.013) were identified as independent risk factors for cardiovascular complications.
Conclusion: Patients requiring cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation were fragile with a high complication rate and a high rate of severe complications even with anaesthesiological support. These complications, as well as the need for deep sedation or general anaesthesia, clearly justify the involvement of a qualified anaesthesiologist.
Comment in
-
Anaesthetist support during sedation for patients undergoing minimally invasive procedures outside the operating room: the call for more research.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Nov;30(11):655-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283613ff9. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013. PMID: 24088724 No abstract available.
-
Anaesthesiological support in a cardiac electrophysiology laboratory.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Apr;31(4):237-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000032. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014. PMID: 24276374 No abstract available.
-
Reply to: anaesthesiological support in a cardiac electrophysiology laboratory.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014 Apr;31(4):238. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000030. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014. PMID: 24296820 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical