Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 30;2013(6):CD007196.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007196.pub3.

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy  1 , Rahul Koti, Giuseppe Fusai, Brian R Davidson
Affiliations

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for uncomplicated biliary colic

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Uncomplicated biliary colic is one of the commonest indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy involves several months of waiting if performed electively. However, people can develop life-threatening complications during this waiting period.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for people with uncomplicated biliary colic due to gallstones.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded until March 2013.

Selection criteria: We included only randomised clinical trials, irrespective of language and publication status.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently extracted the data. We sought to include data on short-term mortality (30-day mortality or in-hospital mortality), bile duct injury, other serious adverse events, quality of life, conversion to open cholecystectomy, length of hospital stay, operating time, and return to work. We planned to calculate the risk ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes using RevMan and based on intention-to-treat analysis when data were available. Since only one trial contributed data to this review, Fisher's exact test was used for binary outcomes. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Main results: Only one trial including 75 participants (average age: 43 years; females: 65% of participants), randomised to early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours after diagnosis) (n = 35) or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (mean waiting period of 4.2 months) (n = 40), contributed information to this review. The trial had a high risk of bias. Information on the outcome mortality was available for the 75 participants. Information on serious adverse events was available for 68 participants (28 people in the early group and 40 people in the delayed group). The other outcomes were available for 28 participants in the early laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 35 participants in the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. There were no deaths in the early group (0/35) (0%) versus 1/40 (2.5%) in the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group (P > 0.9999). There was no bile duct injury in either group. There were no serious adverse events related to the surgery in either group. During the waiting period, complications developed in the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. The complications that the participants suffered included pancreatitis (n = 1), empyema of the gallbladder (n = 1), gallbladder perforation (n = 1), acute cholecystitis (n = 2), cholangitis (n = 2), obstructive jaundice (n = 2), and recurrent biliary colic (requiring hospital visits) (n = 5). In total, 14 participants required hospital admissions for the above symptoms. All of these admissions occurred in the delayed group as all the participants were operated on within 24 hours in the early group. The proportion of people who developed serious adverse events was 0/28 (0%) in the early group, which was significantly lower than in the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy group 9/40 (22.5%) (P = 0.0082). This trial did not report quality of life or return to work. There was no significant difference in the proportion of people who required conversion to open cholecystectomy in the early group 0/28 (0%) compared with the delayed group (6/35 or 17.1%) (P = 0.0743). There was a statistically significant shorter hospital stay in the early group than in the delayed group (MD -1.25 days, 95% CI -2.05 to -0.45). There was a statistically significant shorter operating time in the early group than the delayed group (MD -14.80 minutes, 95% CI -18.02 to -11.58).

Authors' conclusions: Based on evidence from only one high-bias risk trial, it appears that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (less than 24 hours after diagnosis of biliary colic) decreases the morbidity during the waiting period for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (mean waiting time 4.2 months), the hospital stay, and operating time. Further randomised clinical trials are necessary to confirm or refute these findings, and to determine if early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy if the waiting time is shortened further.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic, Outcome 1 Mortality.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic, Outcome 2 Serious adverse events.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic, Outcome 3 Conversion to open cholecystectomy.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic, Outcome 4 Hospital stay (days).
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Early or delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic, Outcome 5 Operating time (minutes).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Macafee 2009 {published data only}
    1. Macafee DA, Humes DJ, Bouliotis G, Beckingham IJ, Whynes DK, Lobo DN. Prospective randomized trial using cost‐utility analysis of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease. British Journal of Surgery 2009;96(9):1031‐40. - PubMed
Salman 2005 {published data only}
    1. Salman B, Yuksel O, Irkorucu O, Akyurek N, Tezcaner T, Dogan I, et al. Urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the best management for biliary colic. A prospective randomized study of 75 cases. Digestive Surgery 2005;22(1‐2):95‐9. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Vetrhus 2002 {published data only}
    1. Schmidt M, Sondenaa K, Vetrhus M, Berhane T, Eide GE. A randomized controlled study of uncomplicated gallstone disease with a 14‐year follow‐up showed that operation was the preferred treatment. Digestive Surgery 2011;28(4):270‐6. - PubMed
    1. Vetrhus M, Søreide O, Solhaug JH, Nesvik I, Søndenaa K. Symptomatic, non‐complicated gallbladder stone disease. Operation or observation? A randomized clinical study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2002;37(7):834‐9. - PubMed

Additional references

Attili 1995
    1. Attili AF, Santis A, Capri R, Repice AM, Maselli S. The natural history of gallstones: The GREPCO experience. The GREPCO group. Hepatology 1995;21(3):655‐60. - PubMed
Ballal 2009
    1. Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP. Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surgical Endoscopy 2009;23(10):2338‐44. - PubMed
Bates 1992
    1. Bates T, Harrison M, Lowe D, Lawson C, Padley N. Longitudinal study of gall stone prevalence at necropsy. Gut 1992;33(1):103‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Berger 2000
    1. Berger MY, Velden JJ, Lijmer JG, Kort H, Prins A, Bohnen AM. Abdominal symptoms: do they predict gallstones? A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 2000;35(1):70‐6. - PubMed
Bingener 2004
    1. Bingener J, Schwesinger WH, Chopra S, Richards ML, Sirinek KR. Does the correlation of acute cholecystitis on ultrasound and at surgery reflect a mirror image?. American Journal of Surgery 2004;188(6):703‐7. - PubMed
Brok 2008
    1. Brok J, Thorlund K, Gluud C, Wetterslev J. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta‐analyses. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61:763‐9. - PubMed
Brok 2009
    1. Brok J, Thorlund K, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Apparently conclusive meta‐analyses may be inconclusive ‐ Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta‐analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):287‐98. - PubMed
CTU 2011
    1. Copenhagen Trial Unit. TSA ‐ Trial Sequential Analysis. http://ctu.dk/tsa/ 2011 (accessed 31 May 2013).
DeMets 1987
    1. DeMets DL. Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations. Statistics in Medicine 1987;6(3):341‐50. - PubMed
DerSimonian 1986
    1. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta‐analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 1986;7(3):177‐88. - PubMed
Dolan 2009
    1. Dolan JP, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG. The national mortality burden and significant factors associated with open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 1997‐2006. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2009;13(12):2292‐301. - PubMed
Egger 1997
    1. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta‐analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 1997;315(7109):629‐34. - PMC - PubMed
Glasgow 2000
    1. Glasgow RE, Cho M, Hutter MM, Mulvihill SJ. The spectrum and cost of complicated gallstone disease in California. Archives of Surgery 2000;135(9):1021‐5; discussion 1025‐7. - PubMed
Gluud 2013
    1. Gluud C, Nikolova D, Klingenberg SL, Alexakis N, Als‐Nielsen B, Colli A, et al. Cochrane Hepato‐Biliary Group. About The Cochrane Collaboration (Cochrane Review Groups (CRGs)). 2013, Issue 5. Art. No.: LIVER.
GREPCO 1984
    1. GREPCO. Prevalence of gallstone disease in an Italian adult female population. Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). American Journal of Epidemiology 1984;119(5):796‐805. - PubMed
GREPCO 1988
    1. GREPCO. The epidemiology of gallstone disease in Rome, Italy. Part i. Prevalence data in men. The Rome Group for the Epidemiology and Prevention of Cholelithiasis (GREPCO). Hepatology 1988;8(4):904‐6. - PubMed
Gurusamy 2013
    1. Gurusamy KS, Davidson C, Samraj K, Gluud C, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005440.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Halldestam 2004
    1. Halldestam I, Enell EL, Kullman E, Borch K. Development of symptoms and complications in individuals with asymptomatic gallstones. British Journal of Surgery 2004;91(6):734‐8. - PubMed
HES 2011
    1. HESonline. Hospital Episode Statistics. Main procedures and interventions: 3 character. http://www.hesonline.nhs.uk/Ease/servlet/ContentServer?siteID=1937&c... 2011 (accessed on 31 May 2013).
Higgins 2002
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21(11):1539‐58. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Colloboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org.
ICH‐GCP 1997
    1. International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Guideline for good clinical practice CFR & ICH Guidelines. Vol. 1, PA 19063‐2043, USA: Barnett International/PAREXEL, 1997.
Kjaergard 2001
    1. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta‐analyses. Annals of Internal Medicine 2001;135(11):982‐9. - PubMed
Lawrentschuk 2003
    1. Lawrentschuk N, Hewitt PM, Pritchard MG. Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: implications of prolonged waiting times for surgery. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 2003;73(11):890‐3. - PubMed
Lundh 2012
    1. Lundh A, Sismondo S, Lexchin J, Busuioc OA, Bero L. Industry sponsorship and research outcome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 12. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000033.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Macaskill 2001
    1. Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2001;20(4):641‐54. - PubMed
Moher 1998
    1. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta‐analyses?. Lancet 1998;352(9128):609‐13. - PubMed
Moher 2001
    1. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (for the CONSORT Group). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel‐group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357(9263):1191‐4. - PubMed
Newell 1992
    1. Newell DJ. Intention‐to‐treat analysis: implications for quantitative and qualitative research. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992;21(5):837‐41. - PubMed
NIH 1992
    1. NIH. NIH consensus statement on gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. http://consensus.nih.gov/1992/1992GallstonesLaparoscopy090html.htm 1992 (accessed 31 May 2013). - PubMed
Peng 2005
    1. Peng WK, Sheikh Z, Nixon SJ, Paterson‐Brown S. Role of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the early management of acute gallbladder disease. British Journal of Surgery 2005;92:586‐91. - PubMed
RevMan 2012 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2012.
Royle 2003
    1. Royle P, Milne R. Literature searching for randomized controlled trials used in Cochrane reviews: rapid versus exhaustive searches. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):591‐603. - PubMed
Rutledge 2000
    1. Rutledge D, Jones D, Rege R. Consequences of delay in surgical treatment of biliary disease. American Journal of Surgery 2000;180(6):466‐9. - PubMed
Savović 2012
    1. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Juni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2012;157(6):429‐38. - PubMed
Savović 2012a
    1. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Jüni P, Pildal J, et al. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment 2012;16(35):1‐82. - PubMed
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995;273(5):408‐12. - PubMed
Shea 1994
    1. Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ, Clarke JR, Kinosian BP, Cabana MD, et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Archives of Internal Medicine 1994;154(22):2573‐81. - PubMed
Sobolev 2003
    1. Sobolev B, Mercer D, Brown P, FitzGerald M, Jalink D, Shaw R. Risk of emergency admission while awaiting elective cholecystectomy. Canadian Medical Association Journal 2003;169(7):662‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Somasekar 2002
    1. Somasekar K, Shankar PJ, Foster ME, Lewis MH. Costs of waiting for gall bladder surgery. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2002;78(925):668‐9. - PMC - PubMed
SPIRIT 2013
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža‐Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 2013;158:200‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Strasberg 1993
    1. Strasberg SM, Clavien PA. Overview of therapeutic modalities for the treatment of gallstone diseases. American Journal of Surgery 1993;165(4):420‐6. - PubMed
Thorlund 2009
    1. Thorlund K, Devereaux PJ, Wetterslev J, Guyatt G, Ioannidis JP, Thabane L, et al. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta‐analyses. International Journal of Epidemiology 2009;38(1):276‐86. - PubMed
Thorlund 2010
    1. Thorlund K, Anema A, Mills E. Interpreting meta‐analysis according to the adequacy of sample size. An example using isoniazid chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis in purified protein derivative negative HIV‐infected individuals. Clinical Epidemiology 2010;2:57‐66. - PMC - PubMed
Thorlund 2011
    1. Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C. User manual for Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). http://ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf 2011 (accessed 31 May 2013).
Trowbridge 2003
    1. Trowbridge RL, Rutkowski NK, Shojania KG. Does this patient have acute cholecystitis?. JAMA 2003;289(1):80‐6. - PubMed
Wetterslev 2008
    1. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2008;61(1):64‐75. - PubMed
Wetterslev 2009
    1. Wetterslev J, Thorlund K, Brok J, Gluud C. Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random‐effects model meta‐analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2009;9:86. - PMC - PubMed
Wood 2008
    1. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Jüni P, Altman GD, et al. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta‐epidemiological study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 2008;336:601‐5. - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Gurusamy 2008
    1. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, Davidson BR. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary colic. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007196.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types