Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Aug 1;178(3):484-92.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kws583. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

Risk of pelvic inflammatory disease following Chlamydia trachomatis infection: analysis of prospective studies with a multistate model

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Risk of pelvic inflammatory disease following Chlamydia trachomatis infection: analysis of prospective studies with a multistate model

Malcolm J Price et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Our objective in this study was to estimate the probability that a Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection will cause an episode of clinical pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and the reduction in such episodes among women with CT that could be achieved by annual screening. We reappraised evidence from randomized controlled trials of screening and controlled observational studies that followed untreated CT-infected and -uninfected women to measure the development of PID. Data from these studies were synthesized using a continuous-time Markov model which takes into account the competing risk of spontaneous clearance of CT. Using a 2-step piecewise homogenous Markov model that accounts for the distinction between prevalent and incident infections, we investigated the possibility that the rate of PID due to CT is greater during the period immediately following infection. The available data were compatible with both the homogenous and piecewise homogenous models. Given a homogenous model, the probability that a CT episode will cause clinical PID was 0.16 (95% credible interval (CrI): 0.06, 0.25), and annual screening would prevent 61% (95% CrI: 55, 67) of CT-related PID in women who became infected with CT. Assuming a piecewise homogenous model with a higher rate during the first 60 days, corresponding results were 0.16 (95% CrI: 0.07, 0.26) and 55% (95% CrI: 32, 72), respectively.

Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Chlamydia trachomatis; Markov model; causal effect; mass screening; meta-analysis; pelvic inflammatory disease; prospective studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Multistate transition model for progression of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) infection in prospective studies. λC is the clearance rate of CT, formula image is the CT infection rate, formula image is the rate at which women with CT develop pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), formula image is the rate at which women without CT develop PID, and the difference δ between formula image and formula image represents the rate of acquiring PID in women with a current CT infection that can be causally attributed to CT.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Marginal posterior distributions of the probability that a Chlamydia trachomatis infection will cause clinical pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), estimated by each model. ACS, all controlled studies; POPI, Prevention of Pelvic Infection; RCT, randomized controlled trial.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Marginal posterior distributions of the proportion of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) episodes caused by Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in women with CT that each model estimated would be prevented by annual screening. ACS, all controlled studies; POPI, Prevention of Pelvic Infection; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

References

    1. Haggerty CL, Gottlieb SL, Taylor BD, et al. Risk of sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection in women. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(2):134–155. - PubMed
    1. Westrom L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, et al. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility—a cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis. 1992;19(4):185–192. - PubMed
    1. Ross J, McCarthy G. UK National Guideline for the Management of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease 2011. London, United Kingdom: British Association for Sexual Health and HIV; 2011. (http://www.bashh.org/BASHH/Guidelines/BASHH/Guidelines/Guidelines.aspx?h.... ). (Accessed May 3, 2013)
    1. Low N. Screening programmes for chlamydial infection: when will we ever learn? BMJ. 2007;334(7596):725–728. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts TE, Robinson S, Barton PM, et al. Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS) project. BMJ. 2007;335(7614):291–294A. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types