Higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus following assisted reproduction technology treatment
- PMID: 23814097
- DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det270
Higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus following assisted reproduction technology treatment
Abstract
Study question: Do mothers following assisted reproduction technology (ART) treatment have increased likelihood of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) compared with non-ART mothers after controlling for maternal factors and plurality?
Summary answer: ART mothers had 28% increased likelihood of GDM compared with non-ART mothers.
What is known already: Advanced maternal age and multiple pregnancies are independently associated with increased likelihood of GDM. Given the average age of mothers having ART treatment is higher than non-ART mothers and the higher multiple pregnancy rate following ART treatment, ART treatment might be expected to be associated with increased risk of GDM.
Study design, size, duration: A population retrospective cohort study of 400 392 mothers who gave birth in Australia between 2007 and 2009, using the Australian National Perinatal Data Collection from five states (Australian Capital Territory, Queensland, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia) where a code for ART treatment is available.
Participants/materials, setting, methods: The study included 13 732 ART mothers and 386 660 non-ART mothers. The prevalence of GDM was compared between ART and non-ART mothers. Logistic regressions were used to assess the association between ART treatment and GDM. Odds ratio (OR), adjusted OR (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.
Main results and the role of chance: A larger proportion of ART mothers were aged ≥40 years compared with non-ART counterpart (11.7 versus 3.4%, P < 0.01). The prevalence of GDM was 7.6% for ART mothers and 5.0% for non-ART mothers (P < 0.01). Mothers who had twins had higher prevalence of GDM than those who gave births to singletons (8.8 versus 7.5%, P = 0.06 for ART mothers; and 7.3 versus 5.0%, P < 0.01 for non-ART mothers). Overall, ART mothers had a 28% increased likelihood of GDM compared with non-ART mothers (AOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.20-1.37). Of mothers who had singletons, ART mothers had higher odds of GDM than non-ART mothers (AOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.36). There was no significant difference in the likelihood of GDM among mothers who had twins between ART and non-ART (AOR 1.18, 95% CI 0.94-1.48). For mothers aged <40 years, the younger the maternal age, the higher the odds of GDM for ART singleton mothers compared with non-ART singleton mothers.
Limitations, reasons for caution: It was not possible to investigate which ART procedure is associated with increased risk of GDM and how the risk could have been minimized. The information on BMI and smoking during pregnancy was not stated for a large proportion of mothers. These limitations may have reduced the validity of the study.
Wider implications of the findings: In agreement with other studies, our data suggest that the underlying cause of subfertility and some particular ART procedures might have played an important role in the increased likelihood of GDM. Together with the public education on not delaying motherhood, minimizing multiple pregnancies by applying single embryo transfer may diminish the excess risk of GDM related to ART treatment.
Keywords: assisted reproduction technology; gestational diabetes mellitus; multiple pregnancy.
Similar articles
-
Cervical conization doubles the risk of preterm and very preterm birth in assisted reproductive technology twin pregnancies.Hum Reprod. 2015 Jan;30(1):197-204. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu260. Epub 2014 Oct 29. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25358346
-
Risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology: a cohort study from the CoNARTaS group.Hum Reprod. 2015 Jul;30(7):1724-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev090. Epub 2015 Apr 29. Hum Reprod. 2015. PMID: 25924655
-
Gestational age-specific perinatal mortality rates for assisted reproductive technology (ART) and other births.Hum Reprod. 2018 Feb 1;33(2):320-327. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex340. Hum Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29140454
-
Do assisted-reproduction twin pregnancies require additional antenatal care?Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Feb;26(2):107-19. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.008. Epub 2012 Nov 24. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013. PMID: 23273753 Review.
-
Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women achieving singleton pregnancy spontaneously or after ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jun 18;26(4):514-544. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa011. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32441298 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Risk for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Chinese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.Int J Endocrinol. 2016;2016:5787104. doi: 10.1155/2016/5787104. Epub 2016 Mar 14. Int J Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 27066074 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 14;18(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2115-4. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 30547777 Free PMC article.
-
Synergistic effect between pre-pregnancy smoking and assisted reproductive technology on gestational diabetes mellitus in twin pregnancies.Acta Diabetol. 2024 Feb;61(2):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02183-z. Epub 2023 Oct 13. Acta Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 37831174
-
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Four Different Methods.Metabolites. 2022 Oct 29;12(11):1040. doi: 10.3390/metabo12111040. Metabolites. 2022. PMID: 36355123 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of educational attainment on the occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus in two successive pregnancies of Finnish primiparous women: a population-based cohort study.Acta Diabetol. 2020 Sep;57(9):1035-1042. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01517-5. Epub 2020 Apr 2. Acta Diabetol. 2020. PMID: 32240385 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials