Knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception among Latina women who desire sterilization
- PMID: 23816156
- PMCID: PMC3707629
- DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.05.001
Knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception among Latina women who desire sterilization
Abstract
Background: There is growing interest in increasing the use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), and suggestions that such methods may serve as an alternative to sterilization. However, there is little information about whether women who do not want more children would be interested in using LARC.
Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 120 parous Latina women in El Paso, Texas, who wanted a sterilization but had not obtained one. We assessed women's awareness of and interest in using the copper intrauterine device (IUD), levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), and etonogestrel implant.
Findings: Overall, 51%, 23%, and 47% of women reported they had heard of the copper IUD, LNG-IUS, and implant, respectively. More women stated they would use the copper IUD (24%) than the LNG-IUS (14%) or implant (9%). Among women interested in LARC, the most common reasons were that, relative to their current method, LARC methods were more convenient, effective, and provided longer-term protection against pregnancy. Those who had reservations about LARC were primarily concerned with menstrual changes. Women also had concerns about side effects and the methods' effectiveness in preventing pregnancy, preferring to use a familiar method.
Conclusions: Although these findings indicate many Latina women in this setting do not consider LARC an alternative to sterilization, they point to an existing demand among some who wish to end childbearing. Efforts are needed to improve women's knowledge and access to a range of methods so they can achieve their childbearing goals.
Copyright © 2013 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The cost-effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods in the UK: analysis based on a decision-analytic model developed for a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical practice guideline.Hum Reprod. 2008 Jun;23(6):1338-45. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den091. Epub 2008 Mar 26. Hum Reprod. 2008. PMID: 18372257
-
Changes in body composition in women using long-acting reversible contraception.Contraception. 2017 Apr;95(4):382-389. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 30. Contraception. 2017. PMID: 28041992 Free PMC article.
-
Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2163-70. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu191. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Hum Reprod. 2014. PMID: 25085802
-
Long-acting reversible contraception: a review in special populations.Pharmacotherapy. 2014 Jan;34(1):46-59. doi: 10.1002/phar.1358. Epub 2013 Oct 15. Pharmacotherapy. 2014. PMID: 24130075 Review.
-
A systematic review on clinical effectiveness, side-effect profile and meta-analysis on continuation rate of etonogestrel contraceptive implant.Reprod Health. 2021 Jan 6;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-01054-y. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33407632 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Factors associated with modern contraceptives use among postpartum women in Bukombe district, Geita region, Tanzania.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0239903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239903. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33052975 Free PMC article.
-
Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review.Reprod Health. 2017 Sep 26;14(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0380-8. Reprod Health. 2017. PMID: 28950913 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Sociocultural Factors on Contraceptive Use: A Case Study of Pakistan.Biomed Res Int. 2022 Sep 14;2022:2939166. doi: 10.1155/2022/2939166. eCollection 2022. Biomed Res Int. 2022. PMID: 36158874 Free PMC article.
-
Are myths surrounding long-acting reversible contraception the reason for a huge unmet need for spacing pregnancies?J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Dec;10(12):4431-4437. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_246_21. Epub 2021 Dec 27. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021. PMID: 35280612 Free PMC article.
-
U.S. physicians' perspectives on the complexities and challenges of permanent contraception provision.Contraception. 2023 May;121:109948. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109948. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Contraception. 2023. PMID: 36641099 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Allen RH, Goldberg AB, Grimes DA. Expanding access to intrauterine contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;201(5):456.e451–456.e455. - PubMed
-
- Baldwin MK, Rodriguez MI, Edelman AB. Lack of insurance and parity influence choice between long-acting reversible contraception and sterilization in women postpregnancy. Contraception. 2012;86(1):42–47. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources