Current incidence of duplicate publication in otolaryngology
- PMID: 23818310
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.24294
Current incidence of duplicate publication in otolaryngology
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: Duplicate publication--deemed highly unethical--is the reproduction of substantial content in another article by the same authors. In 1999, Rosenthal et al. identified an 8.5% incidence of duplicate articles in two otolaryngology journals. We explored the current incidence in three otolaryngology journals in North America and Europe.
Study design: Retrospective literature review.
Methods: Index articles in 2008 in Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Laryngoscope, and Clinical Otolaryngology were searched using MEDLINE. Potential duplicate publications in 2006 through 2010 were identified using the first, second, and last authors' names. Three authors independently investigated suspected duplicate publications--classifying them by degree of duplication.
Results: Of 358 index articles screened, 75 (20.9%) had 119 potential duplicates from 2006 to 2010. Full review of these 119 potential duplicates revealed a total of 40 articles with some form of redundancy (33.6% of the potential duplicates) involving 27 index articles (7.5% of 358 index articles); one (0.8%) "dual" publication (identical or nearly identical data and conclusions to the index article); three (2.5%) "suspected" dual publications (less than 50% new data and same conclusions); and 36 (30.3%) publications with "salami-slicing" (portion of the index article data repeated) were obtained. Further analysis compared the likelihood of duplicate publication by study source and subspecialty within otolaryngology.
Conclusions: The incidence of duplicate publication has not significantly changed over 10 years. "Salami-slicing" was a concerning practice, with no cross-referencing in 61% of these cases. Detecting and eliminating redundant publications is a laborious task, but it is essential in upholding the journal quality and research integrity.
Keywords: Duplicate publication; dual publication; otolaryngology; salami-slicing; suspected dual publication.
© 2013 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Comment in
-
In reference to Current incidence of duplicate publication in otolaryngology.Laryngoscope. 2014 Jul;124(7):E302. doi: 10.1002/lary.24646. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Laryngoscope. 2014. PMID: 24536003 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Duplicate publications in the otolaryngology literature.Laryngoscope. 2003 May;113(5):772-4. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200305000-00002. Laryngoscope. 2003. PMID: 12792309
-
Duplicate publications and related problems in published papers on oral and maxillofacial surgery.Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;53(6):546-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Apr 9. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25866252
-
Duplicate publications: redundancy in plastic surgery literature.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(9):975-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.11.039. Epub 2006 Mar 23. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006. PMID: 16920591
-
Investigating the root causes of duplicate publication in research articles.J Educ Health Promot. 2015 Mar 26;4:14. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.154023. eCollection 2015. J Educ Health Promot. 2015. PMID: 25861659 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Quality of reporting and risk of bias in therapeutic otolaryngology publications.J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Jan;132(1):22-28. doi: 10.1017/S0022215117002407. Epub 2017 Dec 12. J Laryngol Otol. 2018. PMID: 29231150 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessment of Duplicate Publication of Chinese-Sponsored Randomized Clinical Trials.JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027104. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27104. JAMA Netw Open. 2020. PMID: 33270124 Free PMC article.
-
Duplicate Publication and Related Problems in the Pediatrics Literature.Glob Pediatr Health. 2014 Dec 23;1:2333794X14564442. doi: 10.1177/2333794X14564442. eCollection 2014. Glob Pediatr Health. 2014. PMID: 27335929 Free PMC article.
-
Duplicate publication rate decline in Korean medical journals.J Korean Med Sci. 2014 Feb;29(2):172-5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.2.172. Epub 2014 Jan 28. J Korean Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24550641 Free PMC article.
-
Researcher and Author Impact Metrics: Variety, Value, and Context.J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Apr 18;33(18):e139. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e139. eCollection 2018 Apr 30. J Korean Med Sci. 2018. PMID: 29713258 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Mind the Overlap! Meta-Analyses That Synthesize the Findings of Primary Studies Based on Large Data Registries: the Case of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Obes Surg. 2023 Nov;33(11):3689-3691. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06819-5. Epub 2023 Oct 5. Obes Surg. 2023. PMID: 37796374 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources