Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:316950.
doi: 10.1155/2013/316950. Epub 2013 May 30.

Corporate culture assessments in integrative oncology: a qualitative case study of two integrative oncology centers

Affiliations

Corporate culture assessments in integrative oncology: a qualitative case study of two integrative oncology centers

Nadine Mittring et al. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013.

Abstract

The offer of "integrative oncology" is one option for clinics to provide safe and evidence-based complementary medicine treatments to cancer patients. As known from merger theories, corporate culture and integration models have a strong influence on the success of such integration. To identify relevant corporate culture aspects that might influence the success in two highly visible integrative oncology clinics, we interviewed physicians, nurses, practitioners, and managers. All interviews (11 in a German breast cancer clinic and 9 in an integrative medicine cancer service in the USA) were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed with content analysis. According to the theoretical framework of mergers, each clinic selected a different integration type ("best of both worlds" and "linking"). Nonetheless, each developed a similar corporate culture that has a strong focus on research and safe and evidence-based treatments, and fosters a holistic and patient-centered approach. Structured communication within the team and with other departments had high relevance. Research was highlighted as a way to open doors and to facilitate a more general acceptance within the hospital. Conventional physicians felt unburdened by the provision of integrative medicine service but also saw problems in the time required for scheduled treatments, which often resulted in long waiting lists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ernst E, Cassileth BR. The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review. Cancer. 1998;83(4):777–782. - PubMed
    1. Horneber M, Bueschel G, Dennert G, Less D, Ritter E, Zwahlen M. How many cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2011;11(3):187–203. - PubMed
    1. Verhoef MJ, Hilsden RJ, O’Beirne M. Complementary therapies and cancer care: an overview. Patient Education and Counseling. 1999;38(2):93–100. - PubMed
    1. Geffen JR. Integrative oncology for the whole person: a multidimensional approach to cancer care. Integrative Cancer Therapies. 2010;9(1):105–121. - PubMed
    1. Frenkel M, Cohen L. Incorporating complementary and integrative medicine in a comprehensive cancer center. Hematology/Oncology Clinics of North America. 2008;22(4):727–736. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources