Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-S2-S9. Epub 2013 May 31.

Improving health information systems for decision making across five sub-Saharan African countries: Implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative

Collaborators, Affiliations

Improving health information systems for decision making across five sub-Saharan African countries: Implementation strategies from the African Health Initiative

Wilbroad Mutale et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013.

Abstract

Background: Weak health information systems (HIS) are a critical challenge to reaching the health-related Millennium Development Goals because health systems performance cannot be adequately assessed or monitored where HIS data are incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely. The Population Health Implementation and Training (PHIT) Partnerships were established in five sub-Saharan African countries (Ghana, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia) to catalyze advances in strengthening district health systems. Interventions were tailored to the setting in which activities were planned.

Comparisons across strategies: All five PHIT Partnerships share a common feature in their goal of enhancing HIS and linking data with improved decision-making, specific strategies varied. Mozambique, Ghana, and Tanzania all focus on improving the quality and use of the existing Ministry of Health HIS, while the Zambia and Rwanda partnerships have introduced new information and communication technology systems or tools. All partnerships have adopted a flexible, iterative approach in designing and refining the development of new tools and approaches for HIS enhancement (such as routine data quality audits and automated troubleshooting), as well as improving decision making through timely feedback on health system performance (such as through summary data dashboards or routine data review meetings). The most striking differences between partnership approaches can be found in the level of emphasis of data collection (patient versus health facility), and consequently the level of decision making enhancement (community, facility, district, or provincial leadership).

Discussion: Design differences across PHIT Partnerships reflect differing theories of change, particularly regarding what information is needed, who will use the information to affect change, and how this change is expected to manifest. The iterative process of data use to monitor and assess the health system has been heavily communication dependent, with challenges due to poor feedback loops. Implementation to date has highlighted the importance of engaging frontline staff and managers in improving data collection and its use for informing system improvement. Through rigorous process and impact evaluation, the experience of the PHIT teams hope to contribute to the evidence base in the areas of HIS strengthening, linking HIS with decision making, and its impact on measures of health system outputs and impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Visual framework for the health information intervention - Ghana
Figure 2
Figure 2
Visual framework for the health information intervention - Mozambique
Figure 3
Figure 3
Visual framework for the health information intervention - Rwanda
Figure 4
Figure 4
Visual framework for the health information intervention - Tanzania
Figure 5
Figure 5
Visual framework for the health information intervention - Zambia

References

    1. World Health Organization. Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes: WHO's Framework for Action. Geneva: World Heatlh Organization; 2007.
    1. World Health Organization. Health Metrics Network Framework and Standards for Country Health Information Systems. Geneva: World Heatlh Organization; 2008.
    1. Bodart C, Sapirie S. Defining essential information needs and indicators. World Health Forum. 1998;19(3):303–309. - PubMed
    1. Simba DO, Mwangu M. Application of ICT in strengthening health information systems in developing countries in the wake of globalisation. Afr Health Sci. 2004;4(3):194–198. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peersman G, Rugg D, Erkkola T, Kiwango E, Yang J. Are the investments in national HIV monitoring and evaluation systems paying off? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;52(Suppl 2):S87–96. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources