Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jul 2:13:626.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-626.

Promoting healthy weight in primary school children through physical activity and nutrition education: a pragmatic evaluation of the CHANGE! randomised intervention study

Stuart J Fairclough  1 , Allan F Hackett, Ian G Davies, Rebecca Gobbi, Kelly A Mackintosh, Genevieve L Warburton, Gareth Stratton, Esther M F van Sluijs, Lynne M Boddy
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Promoting healthy weight in primary school children through physical activity and nutrition education: a pragmatic evaluation of the CHANGE! randomised intervention study

Stuart J Fairclough et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: This pragmatic evaluation investigated the effectiveness of the Children's Health, Activity and Nutrition: Get Educated! (CHANGE!) Project, a cluster randomised intervention to promote healthy weight using an educational focus on physical activity and healthy eating.

Methods: Participants (n = 318, aged 10-11 years) from 6 Intervention and 6 Comparison schools took part in the 20 weeks intervention between November 2010 and March/April 2011. This consisted of a teacher-led curriculum, learning resources, and homework tasks. Primary outcome measures were waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and BMI z-scores. Secondary outcomes were objectively-assessed physical activity and sedentary time, and food intake. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, at post-intervention (20 weeks), and at follow-up (30 weeks). Data were analysed using 2-level multi-level modelling (levels: school, student) and adjusted for baseline values of the outcomes and potential confounders. Differences in intervention effect by subgroup (sex, weight status, socio-economic status) were explored using statistical interaction.

Results: Significant between-group effects were observed for waist circumference at post-intervention (β for intervention effect =-1.63 (95% CI = -2.20, -1.07) cm, p<0.001) and for BMI z-score at follow-up (β=-0.24 (95% CI = -0.48, -0.003), p=0.04). At follow-up there was also a significant intervention effect for light intensity physical activity (β=25.97 (95% CI = 8.04, 43.89) min, p=0.01). Interaction analyses revealed that the intervention was most effective for overweight/obese participants (waist circumference: β=-2.82 (95% CI = -4.06, -1.58) cm, p<0.001), girls (BMI: β=-0.39 (95% CI = -0.81, 0.03) kg/m2, p=0.07), and participants with higher family socioeconomic status (breakfast consumption: β=8.82 (95% CI = 6.47, 11.16), p=0.07).

Conclusions: The CHANGE! intervention positively influenced body size outcomes and light physical activity, and most effectively influenced body size outcomes among overweight and obese children and girls. The findings add support for the effectiveness of combined school-based physical activity and nutrition interventions. Additional work is required to test intervention fidelity and the sustained effectiveness of this intervention in the medium and long term.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03863885.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of schools and participants through the study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted means (SE) of body size outcomes across each time point. a: waist circumference; b: BMI; c: BMI z-score.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Freedman DS, Mei Z, Srinivasan SR, Berenson GS, Dietz WH. Cardiovascular risk factors and excess adiposity among overweight children and adolescents: the bogalusa heart study. J Pediatr. 2007;150:12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.08.042. e12. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boddy LM, Hackett AF, Stratton G. Changes in fitness, body mass index and obesity in 9–10 year olds. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010;23:254–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2009.01025.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rokholm B, Baker JL, Sorensen TI. The levelling off of the obesity epidemic since the year 1999 - a review of evidence and perspectives. Obes Rev. 2010;11:835–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00810.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rowland T. The childhood obesity epidemic: putting the ‘dynamics’ into thermodynamics. Ped Exerc Sci. 2004;16:87–93.
    1. Hills AP, Andersen LB, Byrne NM. Physical activity and obesity in children. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:866–870. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2011-090199. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data