Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3899-905.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.050. Epub 2013 Jun 29.

Estimates of the timing of reductions in genital warts and high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after onset of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in the United States

Affiliations

Estimates of the timing of reductions in genital warts and high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after onset of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in the United States

Harrell W Chesson et al. Vaccine. .

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to estimate the number of years after onset of a quadrivalent HPV vaccination program before notable reductions in genital warts and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) will occur in teenagers and young adults in the United States.

Methods: We applied a previously published model of HPV vaccination in the United States and focused on the timing of reductions in genital warts among both sexes and reductions in CIN 2/3 among females. Using different coverage scenarios, the lowest being consistent with current 3-dose coverage in the United States, we estimated the number of years before reductions of 10%, 25%, and 50% would be observed after onset of an HPV vaccination program for ages 12-26 years.

Results: The model suggested female-only HPV vaccination in the intermediate coverage scenario will result in a 10% reduction in genital warts within 2-4 years for females aged 15-19 years and a 10% reduction in CIN 2/3 among females aged 20-29 years within 7-11 years. Coverage had a major impact on when reductions would be observed. For example, in the higher coverage scenario a 25% reduction in CIN2/3 would be observed with 8 years compared with 15 years in the lower coverage scenario.

Conclusions: Our model provides estimates of the potential timing and magnitude of the impact of HPV vaccination on genital warts and CIN 2/3 at the population level in the United States. Notable, population-level impacts of HPV vaccination on genital warts and CIN 2/3 can occur within a few years after onset of vaccination, particularly among younger age groups. Our results are generally consistent with early reports of declines in genital warts among youth.

Keywords: Cervical neoplasms; Genital warts; Models; Papillomavirus; Vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: None.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The estimated decline in genital warts among females aged 15–19 years following onset of a quadrivalent HPV vaccination program under 6 vaccination scenarios. Two vaccination strategies (“Female-only vaccination” shown with solid lines and “Male and female vaccination” shown with dashed lines) for ages 12–26 years were modeled under three coverage levels (lower, intermediate, and higher) as described in Table 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The estimated decline in genital warts among males aged 15–19 years following onset of a quadrivalent HPV vaccination program under 6 vaccination scenarios. Two vaccination strategies (“Female-only vaccination” shown with solid lines and “Male and female vaccination” shown with dashed lines) for ages 12–26 years were modeled under three coverage levels (lower, intermediate, and higher) as described in Table 1.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The estimated decline in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 among females aged 20–29 years following onset of a quadrivalent HPV vaccination program under 6 vaccination scenarios. Two vaccination strategies (“Female-only vaccination” shown with solid lines and “Male and female vaccination” shown with dashed lines) for ages 12–26 years were modeled under three coverage levels (lower, intermediate, and higher) as described in Table 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER. Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2007;56(RR-2):1–24. - PubMed
    1. Barnabas RV, Laukkanen P, Koskela P, Kontula O, Lehtinen M, Garnett GP. Epidemiology of HPV 16 and cervical cancer in Finland and the potential impact of vaccination: mathematical modelling analyses. PLoS Med 2006;3(5): e138. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garnett GP, Kim JJ, French K, Goldie SJ. Modelling the impact of HPV vaccines on cervical cancer and screening programmes. Vaccine 2006;24(Suppl. 3):S178–86. - PubMed
    1. Kohli M, Ferko N, Martin A, Franco EL, Jenkins D, Gallivan S, et al. Estimating the long-term impact of a prophylactic human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine on the burden of cervical cancer in the UK. Br J Cancer 2007;96(1):143–50. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brisson M, Van d V, De WP, Boily MC. The potential cost-effectiveness of prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccines in Canada. Vaccine 2007;25(July (20)):5399–408. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances