Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990 May;45(5):352-5.
doi: 10.1136/thx.45.5.352.

Dependence of maximal sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressures on lung volume

Affiliations

Dependence of maximal sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressures on lung volume

T Wanke et al. Thorax. 1990 May.

Abstract

The maximal sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressures of six healthy volunteers (three women and three men) were measured at various lung volumes between residual volume and 95% of total lung capacity. At residual volume the mean (SD) maximum transdiaphragmatic pressure was 163 (18) cm H2O (1 cm H2O = 0.0981 kPa). With increasing lung volume the maximum pressures generated declined, so that at 95% of total lung capacity the mean pressure was 68 (15) cm H2O. Mouth pressures showed a similar relation to lung volume. At residual volume the mean maximum mouth pressure was 74 (8) cm H2O, compared with 38 (6) cm H2O at 95% of total lung capacity. The relation between pressure and lung volume was linear for measurements at lung volume levels between residual volume and 85% of total lung capacity; values at 95% of total lung capacity, however, were lower than predicted from the linear regression of the other points. The use of a second order polynomial regression showed a higher coefficient of determination in all cases (0.72 and 0.69 for transdiaphragmatic and mouth pressures on the basis of all pressure values for all subjects). Sniff generated mouth and transdiaphragmatic pressures show a predictable dependence on lung volume, supporting their use as measures of global inspiratory muscle power and diaphragm strength respectively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170-92 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968 Nov;98(5):848-56 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1964 Sep;19:1016-22 - PubMed
    1. Eur Respir J. 1988 Oct;1(9):863-7 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 1985 Jul;69(1):91-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources