Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 1;116(7):945-52.
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00319.2013. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

Acute mountain sickness, chemosensitivity, and cardiorespiratory responses in humans exposed to hypobaric and normobaric hypoxia

Affiliations
Free article

Acute mountain sickness, chemosensitivity, and cardiorespiratory responses in humans exposed to hypobaric and normobaric hypoxia

Normand A Richard et al. J Appl Physiol (1985). .
Free article

Abstract

We examined the control of breathing, cardiorespiratory effects, and the incidence of acute mountain sickness (AMS) in humans exposed to hypobaric hypoxia (HH) and normobaric hypoxia (NH), and under two control conditions [hypobaric normoxia (HN) and normobaric normoxia (NN)]. Exposures were 6 h in duration, and separated by 2 wk between hypoxic exposures and 1 wk between normoxic exposures. Before and after exposures, subjects (n = 11) underwent hyperoxic and hypoxic Duffin CO2 rebreathing tests and a hypoxic ventilatory response test (HVR). Inside the environmental chamber, minute ventilation (V(E)), tidal volume (V(T)), frequency of breathing (fB), blood oxygenation, heart rate, and blood pressure were measured at 5 and 30 min and hourly until exit. Symptoms of AMS were evaluated using the Lake Louise score (LLS). Both the hyperoxic and hypoxic CO2 thresholds were lower after HH and NH, whereas CO2 sensitivity was increased after HH and NH in the hypoxic test and after NH in the hyperoxic test. Values for HVR were similar across the four exposures. No major differences were observed for Ve or any other cardiorespiratory variables between NH and HH. The LLS was greater in AMS-susceptible than in AMS-resistant subjects; however, LLS was alike between HH and NH. In AMS-susceptible subjects, fB correlated positively and Vt negatively with the LLS. We conclude that 6 h of hypoxic exposure is sufficient to lower the peripheral and central CO2 threshold but does not induce differences in cardiorespiratory variables or AMS incidence between HH and NH.

Keywords: CO2 control of breathing; Lake Louise score; simulated altitude.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Discerning normobaric and hypobaric hypoxia: significance of exposure duration.
    Debevec T, Millet GP. Debevec T, et al. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 May 1;116(9):1255. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00873.2013. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014. PMID: 24789886 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Reply to Debevec and Millet.
    Richard NA, Sahota IS, Widmer N, Ferguson S, Sheel AW, Koehle MS. Richard NA, et al. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 May 1;116(9):1256. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00945.2013. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014. PMID: 24789887 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources