Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):297-302.
doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e31829b6e81.

A comparison of barriers to use of home- versus site-based cardiac rehabilitation

Shamila Shanmugasegaram  1 , Paul Oh, Robert D Reid, Treva McCumber, Sherry L Grace
Affiliations
Comparative Study

A comparison of barriers to use of home- versus site-based cardiac rehabilitation

Shamila Shanmugasegaram et al. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2013 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the established benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains significantly underutilized. It is unknown whether patient barriers to enrollment and adherence are addressed by offering choice of program type. The purpose of this study was to examine barriers to participation in CR by program type (site- vs home-based program) and the relation of these barriers to degree of program participation and exercise behavior.

Methods: One thousand eight hundred nine cardiac patients from 11 hospitals across Ontario completed a sociodemographic survey inhospital, and clinical data were extracted from medical records. They were mailed a followup survey 1 year later, which included the Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale and the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly. Participants were also asked whether they attended CR, the type of program model attended, and the percentage of prescribed sessions completed.

Results: Overall, 939 patients (51.9%) participated in CR, with 96 (10.3%) participating in a home-based program. Home-based participants reported significantly greater CR barriers, including distance, than site-based participants (P < .001). Mean barrier scores were significantly and negatively related to session completion and physical activity among site-based (Ps < .05), but not home-based (NS), CR participants.

Conclusion: The barriers to CR are significantly different among patients attending site- versus home-based programs, suggesting appropriate use of alternative models of care. Patient preferences should be considered when allocating patients to program models. Once in CR, programs should work toward identifying and tackling barriers among site-based participants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Deaton C, Froelicher ES, Wu LH, Ho C, Shishani K, Jaarsma T. The global burden of cardiovascular disease. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2011;26(4):S5–14. - PubMed
    1. Heran BS, Chen JM, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) 2011;(7):CD001800–CD001800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson DR, Clark AM. Cardiac rehabilitation: Into the future. Heart. 2009;95(23):1897–900. - PubMed
    1. Suaya JA, Shepard DS, Normand SLT, Ades PA, Prottas J, Stason WB. Use of cardiac rehabilitation by medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1653–62. - PubMed
    1. Zullo MD, Jackson LW, Whalen CC, Dolansky MA. Evaluation of the recommended core components of cardiac rehabilitation practice. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012;32(1):32–40. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms