Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 3;3(7):e002726.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002726. Print 2013.

A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients' satisfaction with their general practitioners

Stinne Holm Bergholdt  1 , Dorte Gilså Hansen, Pia Veldt Larsen, Jakob Kragstrup, Jens Søndergaard
Affiliations

A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients' satisfaction with their general practitioners

Stinne Holm Bergholdt et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To test whether a complex intervention facilitating early cancer rehabilitation by involvement of the general practitioner (GP) soon after diagnosis improves patients' satisfaction with their GPs.

Design: A cluster randomised controlled trial. All general practices in Denmark were randomised to an intervention or a control group before the start of the study. Patients included those with cancer who were subsequently allocated to either group based on the randomisation status of their GP.

Participants: Adult patients with cancer treated for incident cancer at the public regional hospital (Vejle Hospital, Denmark) were included between May 2008 and February 2009. A total of 955 patients registered with 323 practices were included, of which 486 patients were allocated to the intervention group and 469 to the control group.

Intervention: The intervention included a patient interview assessing the need for rehabilitation, improved information from the hospital to GPs including information on the patients' current needs along with information about needs of patients with cancer in general. Further, GPs were encouraged to proactively contact the patients and facilitate the patients' rehabilitation course.

Outcome measures: 6 months after inclusion of the patient, patient satisfaction with their GP during the last 12 months in five different dimensions of GP care was assessed using the Danish version of the EuroPEP (European Patients Evaluate General Practice Care) questionnaire (DanPEP). 14 months after inclusion, patient satisfaction with the GP regarding the cancer course and GP's satisfaction with own contribution to the patients' rehabilitation course were assessed using ad hoc questions specifically designed for this study.

Results: No overall effect of the intervention was observed. Subgroup analysis of the patients with breast cancer showed statistically significant improvement of satisfaction with the GP in two of the five DanPEP dimensions.

Conclusions: This complex intervention aiming at improving GPs' services in cancer rehabilitation had no impact on patient satisfaction.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration ID number NCT01021371.

Keywords: ONCOLOGY; PRIMARY CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; REHABILITATION MEDICINE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow.
Figure 2
Figure 2
General needs and problems among cancer patients.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Groenvold M, Pedersen C, Jensen CR, et al. The cancer patient's world—an investigation of the problems experienced by Danish cancer patients. Copenhagen: Danish Cancer Society, 2006. [in Danish].
    1. Mikkelsen T, Sondergaard J, Sokolowski I, et al. Cancer survivors’ rehabilitation needs in a primary health care context. Fam Pract 2009;26:221–30 - PubMed
    1. Armes J, Crowe M, Colbourne L, et al. Patients’ supportive care needs beyond the end of cancer treatment: a prospective, longitudinal survey. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:6172–9 - PubMed
    1. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Comittee on Cancer Survivorship. Improving Care and Quality of Life, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Counsil Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2006
    1. Mikkelsen TH, Sondergaard J, Jensen AB, et al. Cancer rehabilitation: psychosocial rehabilitation needs after discharge from hospital? Scand J Prim Health Care 2008;26:216–21 - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources