St. Jude Medical Trifecta™ aortic valve perioperative performance in 200 patients
- PMID: 23825161
- PMCID: PMC3781796
- DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivt270
St. Jude Medical Trifecta™ aortic valve perioperative performance in 200 patients
Abstract
Objectives: The St. Jude Medical Trifecta aortic bioprosthesis (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) is a new stented pericardial tissue heart valve. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and haemodynamic performance of the Trifecta bioprosthesis in the early postoperative period.
Methods: From July 2010 to September 2012, a total of 200 consecutive patients underwent aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve in our institution. All intraoperative and postoperative data were prospectively collected. Mean EuroSCORE II was 3.98%. Echocardiography was performed at discharge in all patients.
Results: The mean age was 71.2 ± 7.7 (range 39-89 years). Extubation in the operating theatre was successfully performed in 96% of patients. Mean hospital stay was 8.5 days. The prosthesis sizes were 19 mm (n = 33), 21 mm (n = 81), 23 mm (n = 59), 25 mm (n = 23) and 27 mm (n = 4). Mean systolic pressure gradients ranged from 9.4 mmHg (size 19 valve) to 4.8 mmHg (size 27 valve). Mean effective orifice area (EOA) ranged from 1.61 cm(2) (size 19 valve) to 2.5 cm(2) (size 27 valve). Severe mismatch (<0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) did not occur in any patient. Of note, 99.5% of patients had mild or no aortic insufficiency at discharge. The early (30-day) mortality was 2.5% (n = 5).
Conclusions: The Trifecta valve offers good clinical results and excellent haemodynamic performance. Special care must be taken to avoid oversizing, which can lead to difficulty in implantation and can produce gradient increases due to an excess of prosthetic leaflet tissue.
Keywords: Aortic valve; Mean effective orifice area; Mean systolic pressure gradients; Trifecta bioprosthesis.
Figures
Comment in
-
eComment. Trifecta: the latest generation of bioprosthetic aortic valves.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;17(4):672-3. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt330. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 24065754 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:732–8. - PubMed
-
- Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003;108:983–8. - PubMed
-
- Ruzicka DJ, Hettich I, Hutter A, Bleiziffer S, Badiu CC, Bauernschmitt R, et al. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S139–45. - PubMed
-
- Chambers JB, Rajani R, Parkin D, Rimington HM, Blauth CI, Venn GE, et al. Bovine pericardial versus porcine stented replacement aortic valves: early results of a randomized comparison of the Perimount and the Mosaic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:1142–8. - PubMed
-
- Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Keithahn A, Guenzinger R, Bleiziffer S, Wagner I, et al. Exercise hemodynamics of bovine versus porcine bioprostheses: a prospective randomized comparison of the mosaic and perimount aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:1056–63. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
