Recent rhetorical studies in public understanding of science: Multiple purposes and strengths
- PMID: 23825315
- DOI: 10.1177/0963662512437330
Recent rhetorical studies in public understanding of science: Multiple purposes and strengths
Abstract
We review rhetorical studies of the public understanding of science that were published in journals since the last major review in this journal (1994-2011). Our review suggests that a vibrant and increasingly sophisticated body of research 1) has pursued Gross's (1994) emphasis on contextual studies and studies emphasizing judgment of scientific rhetorics, 2) is producing a growing body of work designed to develop specific strategies for scientific rhetorics, and 3) has produced a host of studies exploring science-public interactions (rather than producing sustained fora for such interactions, as Gross argued for). It has, however, 4) produced only modest independent development of rhetorical theories.
Keywords: discourses of science; governance of science and technology; interaction experts/publics; lay expertise; public understanding of science; representations of science; science and popular culture; science communication; scientific controversies; studies of science and technology.
Similar articles
-
Ecological validity and the study of publics: The case for organic public engagement methods.Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):77-91. doi: 10.1177/0963662513493575. Epub 2013 Jul 25. Public Underst Sci. 2014. PMID: 23887250
-
Making sense of research on the neuroimage bias.Public Underst Sci. 2017 Feb;26(2):251-258. doi: 10.1177/0963662515604975. Epub 2016 Aug 3. Public Underst Sci. 2017. PMID: 26386020
-
The character of scientists in the Nobel Prize speeches.Public Underst Sci. 2018 May;27(4):417-432. doi: 10.1177/0963662518756559. Public Underst Sci. 2018. PMID: 29720063
-
Public knowledge and public trust.Community Genet. 2006;9(3):204-10. doi: 10.1159/000092658. Community Genet. 2006. PMID: 16741351 Review.
-
Steering vaccinomics innovations with anticipatory governance and participatory foresight.OMICS. 2011 Sep;15(9):637-46. doi: 10.1089/omi.2011.0087. Epub 2011 Aug 17. OMICS. 2011. PMID: 21848419 Review.
Cited by
-
Dealing with dissent from the medical ranks: Public health authorities and COVID-19 communication.Public Underst Sci. 2024 May;33(4):414-429. doi: 10.1177/09636625231204563. Epub 2023 Nov 16. Public Underst Sci. 2024. PMID: 37970636 Free PMC article.
-
Rhetorics of health citizenship: exploring vernacular critiques of government's role in supporting healthy living.J Med Humanit. 2014 Jun;35(2):131-47. doi: 10.1007/s10912-014-9276-6. J Med Humanit. 2014. PMID: 24687215
-
Expectations in the field of the internet and health: an analysis of claims about social networking sites in clinical literature.Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Mar;37(3):468-84. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12203. Sociol Health Illn. 2015. PMID: 25847533 Free PMC article.
-
Managing Expectational Language: Translational genetic professionals consider the clinical potential of next-generation sequencing technologies.New Genet Soc. 2014 Jun 1;33(2):126-148. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2014.910448. New Genet Soc. 2014. PMID: 24883042 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources