Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 28:7:317.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00317. Print 2013.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Andrea Antal  1 , Walter Paulus
Affiliations

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Andrea Antal et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) seems likely to open a new era of the field of noninvasive electrical stimulation of the human brain by directly interfering with cortical rhythms. It is expected to synchronize (by one single resonance frequency) or desynchronize (e.g., by the application of several frequencies) cortical oscillations. If applied long enough it may cause neuroplastic effects. In the theta range it may improve cognition when applied in phase. Alpha rhythms could improve motor performance, whereas beta intrusion may deteriorate them. TACS with both alpha and beta frequencies has a high likelihood to induce retinal phosphenes. Gamma intrusion can possibly interfere with attention. Stimulation in the "ripple" range induces intensity dependent inhibition or excitation in the motor cortex (M1) most likely by entrainment of neuronal networks, whereas stimulation in the low kHz range induces excitation by neuronal membrane interference. TACS in the 200 kHz range may have a potential in oncology.

Keywords: human brain; motor; oscillations; tACS; visual.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ambrus G. G., Paulus W., Antal A. (2010). Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: comparison of tDCS and tRNS. Clin. Neurophysiol. 121, 1908–1914 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ambrus G. G., Zimmer M., Kincses Z. T., Harza I., Kovacs G., Paulus W., et al. (2011). The enhancement of cortical excitability over the DLPFC before and during training impairs categorization in the prototype distortion task. Neuropsychologia 49, 1974–1980 - PubMed
    1. Antal A., Boros K., Poreisz C., Chaieb L., Terney D., Paulus W. (2008). Comparatively weak after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on cortical excitability in humans. Brain Stimul. 1, 97–105 10.1016/j.brs.2007.10.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bannister A. P. (2005). Inter- and intra-laminar connections of pyramidal cells in the neocortex. Neurosci. Res. 53, 95–103 - PubMed
    1. Batsikadze G., Moliadze V., Paulus W., Kuo M. F., Nitsche M. A. (2013). Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans. J. Physiol. 591, 1987–2000 - PMC - PubMed