Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jun 24;8(6):e66882.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066882. Print 2013.

Postpartum haemorrhage in Canada and France: a population-based comparison

Marie-Pierre Bonnet  1 , Olga Basso, Marie-Hélène Bouvier-Colle, Corinne Dupont, René-Charles Rudigoz, Rebecca Fuhrer, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Postpartum haemorrhage in Canada and France: a population-based comparison

Marie-Pierre Bonnet et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Maternal mortality ratio due to postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is higher in France than in Canada. We explored this difference by comparing PPH features between these two countries.

Methods: Using data between 2004 and 2006, we compared the incidence, risk factors, causes and use of second-line treatments, of PPH between France (N = 6,660 PPH) and Canada (N = 9,838 PPH). We assessed factors associated with PPH through multivariate logistic models.

Results: PPH incidence, overall (4.8% (95% CI 4.7-4.9) in Canada and 4.5% (95% CI 4.4-4.7) in France), and after vaginal delivery (5.3% (95%CI 5.2-5.4) in Canada and 4.8 (95%CI 4.7-4.9) in France), were significantly higher in Canada than in France, but not after caesarean delivery. Women delivering without PPH were similar between the two populations, except for macrosomia (11% in Canada, 7% in France, p<0.001), caesarean delivery (27% in Canada, 18% in France, p<0.001), and episiotomy (17% in Canada, 34% in France, p<0.001). After vaginal delivery, factors strongly associated with PPH were multiple pregnancy, operative delivery and macrosomia in both populations, and episiotomy only in France (Odds Ratio 1.39 (95% CI 1.23-1.57)). The use of second-line treatments for PPH management was significantly more frequent in France than in Canada after both vaginal and caesarean delivery.

Conclusion: PPH incidence was not higher in France than in Canada and there was no substantial difference in PPH risk factors between the 2 countries. Greater use of second-line treatments in PPH management in France suggests a more frequent failure of first-line treatments and a higher rate of severe PPH, which may be involved in the higher maternal mortality ratio due to PPH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF (2006) WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 367: 1066–1074. - PubMed
    1. Cristina Rossi A, Mullin P (2012) The etiology of maternal mortality in developed countries: a systematic review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285: 1499–1503. - PubMed
    1. Institut de Veille Sanitaire (2010) Report from the national committee of experts on maternal mortality (2001–2006). Saint Maurice:InVS. 99p.
    1. Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (2007) Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer - 2003–2005. London: Center for Maternal and Child Enquiry (CMACE, former CEMACH). 267p.
    1. Public Health Agency of Canada (2008) Canadian Perinatal Health Report, 2008 Edition. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada.317p.

Publication types