Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jul 6:12:66.
doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-66.

Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection systems

Affiliations
Review

Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection systems

Raul Igual et al. Biomed Eng Online. .

Abstract

Since falls are a major public health problem among older people, the number of systems aimed at detecting them has increased dramatically over recent years. This work presents an extensive literature review of fall detection systems, including comparisons among various kinds of studies. It aims to serve as a reference for both clinicians and biomedical engineers planning or conducting field investigations. Challenges, issues and trends in fall detection have been identified after the reviewing work. The number of studies using context-aware techniques is still increasing but there is a new trend towards the integration of fall detection into smartphones as well as the use of machine learning methods in the detection algorithm. We have also identified challenges regarding performance under real-life conditions, usability, and user acceptance as well as issues related to power consumption, real-time operations, sensing limitations, privacy and record of real-life falls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimation of the number of fall detection studies. We have made a longitudinal study of published papers, classifying the detection techniques into three categories. The line graph (associated with the right axis) represents the estimated absolute number of studies published in the three categories from 2005 to 2012. The bar graph (associated with the left axis) shows the estimated percentage of studies published every year in relation to the total number of existing studies for each category (e.g., 43.3% of the existing smartphone-based studies were published in 2012).

References

    1. World Health Organization. Global report on falls prevention in older age. [ http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Falls_prevention7March.pdf]
    1. Friedman SM, Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, Fried LP. Falls and Fear of Falling: Which Comes First? A Longitudinal Prediction Model Suggests Strategies for Primary and Secondary Prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1329–1335. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50352.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scheffer AC, Schuurmans MJ, van Dijk N, van der Hooft T, de Rooij SE. Fear of falling: measurement strategy, prevalence, risk factors and consequences among older persons. Age Ageing. 2008;37:19–24. - PubMed
    1. Brownsell S, Hawley MS. Automatic fall detectors and the fear of falling. J Telemed Telecare. 2004;10:262–266. doi: 10.1258/1357633042026251. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR. The epidemiology of falls and syncope. Clin Geriatr Med. 2002;18:141–58. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0690(02)00002-2. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types