Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;82(3):713-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.075. Epub 2013 Jul 4.

Radiation history affects continence outcomes after advance transobturator sling placement in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence

Affiliations

Radiation history affects continence outcomes after advance transobturator sling placement in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence

Robert Torrey et al. Urology. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effects of preoperative external radiation therapy (XRT) on a cohort of patients who underwent AdVance transobturator urethral sling (ATUS) placement for post-prostatectomy incontinence.

Methods: Thirty-seven patients underwent placement of an ATUS from 2008 to 2010. Patients with and without a history of preoperative XRT were retrospectively compared in regard to their demographical, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative details.

Results: The median follow-up was 17.3 months. Preoperative pad usage was significantly higher in the XRT patient group (P = .03). Overall, 19 patients (51.4%) used no pads, 10 patients (27.0%) were improved, 4 patients (10.8%) had no change, and 4 patients (10.8%) experienced worsening incontinence after the surgery. In patients with and without a history of XRT, 0 (0%) and 19 (63.3%) used no pads, 2 (28.6%) and 8 (26.7%) were improved, 2 (28.6%) and 2 (6.7%) showed no change, and 3 (42.9%) and 1 (3.3%) were worse, respectively. In comparing patients with more severe incontinence preoperatively (>1 pad/day), those with and without radiation, 0 (0%) and 7 (46.7%) used no pads, 2 (28.6%) and 7 (46.7%) were improved, 2 (28.6%) and 0 (0%) had no change, and 3 (42.9%) and 1 (6.7%) were worse, respectively, after ATUS placement. Thus, patients without XRT had an advantage in postoperative pad usage (P = .001), and, furthermore, had improved quality of life (86.2% vs 28.6%, P = .006).

Conclusion: The ATUS provides excellent continence outcomes in patients suffering from post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. However, previous pelvic irradiation seems to severely compromise the effectiveness of the ATUS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Editorial comment.
    Chai TC. Chai TC. Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):717. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.023. Urology. 2013. PMID: 23987167 No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources