Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May;16(3):189-93.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.111311.

The effect of a new-generation flowable composite resin on microleakage in Class V composite restorations as an intermediate layer

Soley Arslan  1 , Sezer Demirbuga, Yakup Ustun, Asiye Nur Dincer, Burhan Can Canakci, Yahya Orcun Zorba
Affiliations

The effect of a new-generation flowable composite resin on microleakage in Class V composite restorations as an intermediate layer

Soley Arslan et al. J Conserv Dent. 2013 May.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of application a new-generation bulk-fill flowable composite resin as an intermediate material between composite resin and dental substrates on micro-leakage in Class V composite restorations.

Materials and methods: A total of 144 Class V cavities were prepared in 72 human molars. Specimens were then randomly distributed among three groups according to adhesive system applied (Group 1: Clearfil SE Bond; Group 2: Adper Easy One; Group 3: Adhesive 200T), and each group was divided into three subgroups according to liner material used (Group A: No liner-control group; Group B: Aelite Flo LV, low viscosity microhybrid composite; Group C: Smart dentin replacement). All cavities were restored using resin composite (Aelite LS, low shrinkage posterior composite). Specimens were stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin and evaluated dye penetration.

Results: There was no significant difference in dye penetration was found between the control and the experimental groups.

Conclusions: Micro-leakage is not affected by the application of either conventional or new-generation flowable composite resin as an intermediate material between composite resin and dental substrates.

Keywords: Adhesives; flowable composite resins; intermediate layers; microleakage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Alonso RC, Sinhoreti MA, Correr Sobrinho L, Consani S, Goes MF. Effect of resin liners on the microleakage of class V dental composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12:56–61. - PubMed
    1. Bayındır YZ, Bayındır F, Zorba YO, Turgut H. Influence of different bonding systems and soft-start polymerization marginal gap formation. Mater Res Innovat. 2008;12:166–71.
    1. Simi B, Suprabha B. Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14:178–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Radhika M, Sajjan GS, Kumaraswamy BN, Mittal N. Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations. J Conserv Dent. 2010;13:9–15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Estafan D, Estafan A, Leinfelder KF. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites. Am J Dent. 2000;13:192–4. - PubMed