Comparison of neonatal growth in normal, low and very low birth weights until 18 months
- PMID: 23833595
- PMCID: PMC3696971
Comparison of neonatal growth in normal, low and very low birth weights until 18 months
Abstract
Background: Birth weight is considered as the most important index of neonates' growth as well as the most important determinant of infants' mortality. This study was conducted to investigate the growth pattern in normal, low and very low birth weight neonates for 18 months in the health care centers of Isfahan, Iran.
Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional and retrospective study, 214 neonates (90 with normal, 90 with low and 34 with very low birth weights) were enrolled in the health care centers of Isfahan and their growth in the 2(nd), 4(th), 6(th), 9(th), 12(th), 15(th) and 18(th) months were investigated. The data collection tool was a 3-part questionnaire which was validated using content validity. A part of data was completed based on the health file of the family.
Findings: The mean of weight, height and head circumference in the months 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 in the three groups with normal, low and very low birth weights were significantly different. In the ages of 6, 15, 12 and 18 months, there was the highest frequency of horizontal trend in the growth pattern of children in the three groups. In the growth rate of neonates with low birth weight, there was the highest frequency of horizontal trend at the age of 12 months and there was the highest frequency of descending trend in the 15(th) months.
Conclusions: The findings showed that according to National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) percentiles, low and very low birth weight infants had lower growth in weight, length and head circumference compared to normal birth weight infants. Therefore, special attention should be given to healthcare and post-birth growth surveillance of these two groups to maintain and improve the health level of them.
Keywords: Neonate; children; growth surveillance; low birth weight; very low birth weight.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):761-768. doi: 10.1002/uog.20258. Epub 2019 Apr 30. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30883981
-
[Growth standard curves of birth weight, length and head circumference of Chinese newborns of different gestation].Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 2;58(9):738-746. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20200316-00242. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32872714 Chinese.
-
Growth charts of heights and weights of male children and adolescents of Isfahan, Iran.J Health Popul Nutr. 2003 Dec;21(4):341-6. J Health Popul Nutr. 2003. PMID: 15038589
-
Growth patterns and body composition in former extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates until adulthood: a systematic review.Eur J Pediatr. 2020 May;179(5):757-771. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03552-z. Epub 2020 Jan 4. Eur J Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 31901983
-
[WHO growth standards for infants and young children].Arch Pediatr. 2009 Jan;16(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Nov 25. Arch Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 19036567 Review. French.
References
-
- Marcdante K, Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB. Nelson Essentials of Pediatrics. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. p. 13.
-
- Reza Soltanie P, Parsaee S. Mother and Child’s Health. Tehran: Sanjesh Publication; 2006.
-
- Nelson WE. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 18th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007.
-
- Ball J, Bindler RM, Bindler RC, Cowen KJ. Child health nursing: partnering with children & families. Chicago: Pearson; 2009.
-
- Van Der Mei J, Volmer M, Boersma ER. Growth and survival of low birthweight infants from 0 to 9 years in a rural area of Ghana. Comparison of moderately low (1,501–2,000 g) and very low birthweight (1,000–1,500 g) infants and a local reference population. Trop Med Int Health. 2000;5(8):571–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources