Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Oct;36(10):3162-8.
doi: 10.2337/dc13-0184. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

Sex disparities in the quality of diabetes care: biological and cultural factors may play a different role for different outcomes: a cross-sectional observational study from the AMD Annals initiative

Collaborators, Affiliations
Observational Study

Sex disparities in the quality of diabetes care: biological and cultural factors may play a different role for different outcomes: a cross-sectional observational study from the AMD Annals initiative

Maria Chiara Rossi et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the quality of type 2 diabetes care according to sex.

Research design and methods: Clinical data collected during the year 2009 were extracted from electronic medical records; quality-of-care indicators were evaluated. Multilevel logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate the likelihood of women versus men to be monitored for selected parameters, to reach clinical outcomes, and to be treated with specific classes of drugs. The intercenter variability in the proportion of men and women achieving the targets was also investigated.

Results: Overall, 415,294 patients from 236 diabetes outpatient centers were evaluated, of whom 188,125 (45.3%) were women and 227,169 (54.7%) were men. Women were 14% more likely than men to have HbA1c>9.0% in spite of insulin treatment (odds ratio 1.14 [95% CI 1.10-1.17]), 42% more likely to have LDL cholesterol (LDL-C)≥130 mg/dL (1.42 [1.38-1.46]) in spite of lipid-lowering treatment, and 50% more likely to have BMI≥30 kg/m2 (1.50 [1.50-1.54]). Women were less likely to be monitored for foot and eye complications. In 99% of centers, the percentage of men reaching the LDL-C target was higher than in women, the proportion of patients reaching the HbA1c target was in favor of men in 80% of the centers, and no differences emerged for blood pressure.

Conclusions: Women show a poorer quality of diabetes care than men. The attainment of the LDL-C target seems to be mainly related to pathophysiological factors, whereas patient and physician attitudes can play an important role in other process measures and outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of data selection and sample size for each indicator (n).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intercenter variability in the percentage difference of men and women achieving the main clinical therapeutic targets. (A high-quality color representation of this figure is available in the online issue.)

References

    1. McGregor AJ, Choo E. Gender-specific medicine: yesterday’s neglect, tomorrow’s opportunities. Acad Emerg Med 2012;19:861–865 - PubMed
    1. Legato MJ, Gelzer A, Goland R, et al. Writing Group for The Partnership for Gender-Specific Medicine Gender-specific care of the patient with diabetes: review and recommendations. Gend Med 2006;3:131–158 - PubMed
    1. Juutilainen A, Kortelainen S, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Gender difference in the impact of type 2 diabetes on coronary heart disease risk. Diabetes Care 2004;27:2898–2904 - PubMed
    1. Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M. Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ 2006;332:73–78 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanaya AM, Grady D, Barrett-Connor E. Explaining the sex difference in coronary heart disease mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1737–1745 - PubMed

Publication types