Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):315-23.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1509.

Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening: analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits

Bo Feng  1 , Malathi Srinivasan, Jerome R Hoffman, Julie A Rainwater, Erin Griffin, Marko Dragojevic, Frank C Day, Michael S Wilkes
Affiliations

Physician communication regarding prostate cancer screening: analysis of unannounced standardized patient visits

Bo Feng et al. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a controversial issue. The present study aimed to explore physician behaviors during an unannounced standardized patient encounter that was part of a randomized controlled trial to educate physicians using a prostate cancer screening, interactive, Web-based module.

Methods: Participants included 118 internal medicine and family medicine physicians from 5 health systems in California, in 2007-2008. Control physicians received usual education about prostate cancer screening (brochures from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention). Intervention physicians participated in the prostate cancer screening module. Within 3 months, all physicians saw unannounced standardized patients who prompted prostate cancer screening discussions in clinic. The encounter was audio-recorded, and the recordings were transcribed. Authors analyzed physician behaviors around screening: (1) engagement after prompting, (2) degree of shared decision making, and (3) final recommendations for prostate cancer screening.

Results: After prompting, 90% of physicians discussed prostate cancer screening. In comparison with control physicians, intervention physicians showed somewhat more shared decision making behaviors (intervention 14 items vs control 11 items, P <.05), were more likely to mention no screening as an option (intervention 63% vs control 26%, P <.05), to encourage patients to consider different screening options (intervention 62% vs control 39%, P <.05) and seeking input from others (intervention 25% vs control 7%, P<.05).

Conclusions: A brief Web-based interactive educational intervention can improve shared decision making, neutrality in recommendation, and reduce PSA test ordering. Engaging patients in discussion of the uses and limitations of tests with uncertain value can decrease utilization of the tests.

Keywords: health communication; medical education; patient-centered care; primary care; prostate cancer; prostate cancer screening; qualitative analysis; randomized controlled trial; risk-benefit assessment; shared decision making; unannounced standardized patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Randomization scheme and participation flow of an intervention to improve shared decision making during prostate cancer screening discussions by primary care physicians, as-treated transcript analysis.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Andriole GL, Crawford ED, Grubb RL, III, et al. PLCO Project Team Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1310–1319 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. ERSPC Investigators Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(13):1320–1328 - PubMed
    1. Volk RJ, Cass AR, Spann SJ. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999; 8(4):333–340 - PubMed
    1. Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(11):762–771 - PubMed
    1. Moyer VAU.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):120–134 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances