Examining rectal carcinoids in the era of screening colonoscopy: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis
- PMID: 23838863
- DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318291f512
Examining rectal carcinoids in the era of screening colonoscopy: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the epidemiology of rectal carcinoids in the United States since the implementation of screening colonoscopy.
Objective: The goal of this study was to identify epidemiological differences between rectal and small intestinal carcinoids.
Design: This study was retrospective in design.
Setting: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry data from 1992 to 2008 were examined.
Patients: Patients with rectal carcinoids included those with carcinoid tumors of the rectum. Patients with small intestinal carcinoids included those with carcinoids in the duodenum, jejunum, or ileum.
Main outcome measure: Epidemiological characteristics of rectal carcinoids were identified and compared with small intestinal carcinoids using multiple variable logistic regression.
Results: Patients with rectal carcinoids were more likely to be women (OR, 1.196 (95% CI, 1.090-1.311); p < 0.001). Rectal carcinoids were more common among all minorities, including Asians (OR, 10.063 (95% CI, 8.330-12.157); p < 0.001), blacks (OR, 1.994 (95% CI, 1.770-2.246); p < 0.001), and Hispanics (OR, 2.682 (95% CI, 2.291-3.141), p < 0.001). Patients in the 50- to 59-year age group (OR, 0.752 (95% CI, 0.599-0.944); p = 0.014) were more likely to be diagnosed with rectal carcinoids than those in the 60- to 69-year (OR, 0.481 (95% CI, 0.383-0.605); p < 0.001) and ≥70-year age groups (OR, 0.220 (95% CI, 0.175-0.277); p < 0.001). Rectal carcinoids were more likely to be diagnosed in the screening colonoscopy era among the 50- to 59-year age group (OR, 1.432 (95% CI, 1.082-1.895); p = 0.012). Since the implementation of screening colonoscopy in 2000, the proportion of patients diagnosed with rectal carcinoids has been greater than the proportion diagnosed with small intestinal carcinoids in every year except 2001, and the proportion of patients diagnosed with rectal carcinoids after 2000 has been greater than the proportion diagnosed with small intestinal carcinoids in 12 of 13 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry reporting agencies.
Conclusions: Rectal carcinoids and small intestinal carcinoids are epidemiologically distinct tumors with unique presentations. In the era of screening colonoscopy, rectal carcinoids are the more common tumor.
Similar articles
-
Adenocarcinoma of the rectum in patients under age 40 is increasing: impact of signet-ring cell histology.Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 May;58(5):474-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000318. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015. PMID: 25850833
-
Rectal carcinoids are on the rise: early detection by screening endoscopy.Endoscopy. 2009 Feb;41(2):162-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119456. Epub 2009 Feb 12. Endoscopy. 2009. PMID: 19214898 Review.
-
Demographics and tumor characteristics of colorectal cancers in the United States, 1998-2001.Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;107(5 Suppl):1112-20. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22008. Cancer. 2006. PMID: 16838314
-
The impact of incidental identification on the stage at presentation of lower gastrointestinal carcinoids.J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Nov;213(5):652-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.07.021. Epub 2011 Aug 31. J Am Coll Surg. 2011. PMID: 21880512
-
[Rectal carcinoids on the rise - update].Z Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;47(4):365-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1027930. Epub 2009 Apr 8. Z Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19358064 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Risk of metastasis and survival in patients undergoing different treatment strategies with T1 colonic neuroendocrine tumors.J Endocrinol Invest. 2024 Mar;47(3):671-681. doi: 10.1007/s40618-023-02185-2. Epub 2023 Aug 31. J Endocrinol Invest. 2024. PMID: 37653287
-
Rectal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Why Is There a Global Variation?Curr Oncol Rep. 2022 Mar;24(3):257-263. doi: 10.1007/s11912-021-01172-1. Epub 2022 Jan 27. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022. PMID: 35084662 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for stage 1 rectal neuroendocrine tumors.World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Feb 16;17(2):99906. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i2.99906. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39989850 Free PMC article.
-
Time to give up traditional methods for the management of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumours.World J Clin Cases. 2021 Oct 16;9(29):8627-8646. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8627. World J Clin Cases. 2021. PMID: 34734042 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Traction Devices May Not Affect the Vertical Margin Distance in the Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors.Cureus. 2024 Apr 25;16(4):e58976. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58976. eCollection 2024 Apr. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38800345 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical