Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Oct;37(10):2387-92.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2150-2.

Radical laparoscopic treatment for liver hydatidosis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Radical laparoscopic treatment for liver hydatidosis

Jose M Ramia et al. World J Surg. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Background: There is no scientific evidence to show which surgical technique should be used in treating hydatidosis of the liver; nor is there consensus on whether laparoscopy should be used in hydatidosis, because of the risk of dissemination or anaphylaxis.

Materials: We conducted a multicenter study of laparoscopic radical surgery for hydatidosis of the liver (LRSH). The main objectives of the study were to determine the feasibility of LRSH, to examine the associated morbidity, and to evaluate the associated recurrence rate.

Materials and methods: The present report is based on a retrospective multicenter study of patients with hydatid disease of the liver treated by LRSH. The study period was from January 2000 to April 2012.

Results: There were 37 patients (46 % male) with 43 cysts. The median age was 53.1 years. Median cyst size was 5.8 cm. The most common location of the cyst was the left lateral sector (62 %). The median number of trocars used was 4. Protective scolicide-soaked swabs were used in 57 % of patients. We performed 24 total closed cystectomies, 12 left lateral sectionectomies, and 4 liver resections. The median operating time was 185 min and the mean blood loss was 184 mL. The conversion rate was 8 %. Morbidity was 16 % and mortality 0 %. The length of hospital stay was 4.8 days. No cyst recurrence was observed after a follow-up of 30.6 months.

Conclusions: Despite the limitations and biases of a retrospective multicenter study, we believe that LRSH is feasible in favorable segments but is technically demanding. The low morbidity and absence of recurrence suggest that LRSH should be performed whenever feasible.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. BMC Surg. 2009 Sep 07;9:14 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 2002 Oct;137(10):1170-3 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2357-64 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 1998 May;12(5):452-4 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec;20(12):1909-13 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources