Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun 26;8(6):e66905.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066905. Print 2013.

Rapid Syphilis Tests as Catalysts for Health Systems Strengthening: A Case Study from Peru

Affiliations

Rapid Syphilis Tests as Catalysts for Health Systems Strengthening: A Case Study from Peru

Patricia J García et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: Untreated maternal syphilis leads to adverse pregnancy outcomes. The use of point of care tests (POCT) offers an opportunity to improve screening coverage for syphilis and other aspects of health systems. Our objective is to present the experience of the introduction of POCT for syphilis in Peru and describe how new technology can catalyze health system strengthening.

Methods: The study was implemented from September 2009-November 2010 to assess the feasibility of the use of a POCT for syphilis for screening pregnant women in Lima, Peru. Outcomes measured included access to syphilis screening, treatment coverage, partner treatment, effect on patient flow and service efficiency, acceptability among providers and patients, and sustainability.

Results: Before the introduction of POCT, a pregnant woman needed 6 visits to the health center in 27 days before she received her syphilis result. We trained 604 health providers and implemented the POCT for syphilis as the "two for one strategy", offering with one finger stick both syphilis and HIV testing. Implementation of the POCT resulted in testing and treatment on the first visit. Screening and treatment coverages for syphilis improved significantly compared with the previous year. Implementation of POCT has been scaled up nationally since the study ended, and coverages for screening, treatment and partner treatment have remained over 92%.

Conclusions: Implementation of POCT for syphilis proved feasible and acceptable, and led to improvement in several aspects of health services. For the process to be effective we highlight the importance of: (1) engaging the authorities; (2) dissipating tensions between providers and identifying champions; (3) training according to the needs; (4) providing monitoring, supervision, support and recognition; (5) sharing results and discussing actions together; (6) consulting and obtaining feedback from users; and (7) integrating with other services such as with rapid HIV testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Syphilis screening and treatment in pregnant women, antenatal care and labor.
Peru (1997–2008). Nationally the coverage for syphilis screening in pregnant women in antenatal care has been 75% since 2000, but treatment coverage for syphilis seropositive pregnant women fallen intermittently, from over 80% in 2000, to as low as 30% in 2004. Screening for syphilis for women during labor has been low as well as the treatment of women found seropositive in this situation.
Figure 2
Figure 2. First antenatal care visit: Changes before and after the implementation of POCT for syphilis (Ventanilla-Callao).
Before the implementation of the POCT for syphilis, women needed 27 days to have the HIV and Syphilis tests results as part of the first antenatal care visit (ANC) visit. After the implementation, the testing and results are done on the same visit.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparative screening coverage: Ventanilla-Callao and INMP 2009 by RPR and 2010 by syphilis POCT.
Syphilis screening coverage improved at the peripheral network of health centers in Ventanilla from 35% to 93% and at the INMP from 68% to 95% from 2009 to 2010.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDermott J, Steketee R, Larsen S (1993) Syphilis-associated perinatal and infant mortality in rural Malawi. Bull World Health Organ 71: 773–780. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawkes S, Matin N, Broutet N, Low N (2011) Effectiveness of interventions to improve screening for syphilis in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 11: 684–691. - PubMed
    1. Watson-Jones D, Gumodoka B, Weiss H, Changalucha J, Todd J, et al. (2002) Syphilis in pregnancy in Tanzania. II. The effectiveness of antenatal syphilis screening and single-dose benzathine penicillin treatment for the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcome. J Infect Dis. 186: 948–957. - PubMed
    1. Saloojee H, Velaphi S, Goga Y, Afadapa N, Steen R, et al. (2004) The prevention and management of congenital syphilis: an overview and recommendations. Bull World Health Organ. 82: 424–430. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kamb ML, Newman LM, Riley PL, Mark J, Hawkes SJ, et al. (2010) A road map for the global elimination of congenital syphilis. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010: 1–6. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types