Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Feb;48(2):184-8.
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31829ae376.

Comparison of midodrine and albumin in the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhotic patients: a randomized pilot study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of midodrine and albumin in the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction in cirrhotic patients: a randomized pilot study

Hassan Hamdy et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Goals: In this pilot study, we compared midodrine and albumin in the prevention of paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction (PICD).

Background: PICD with pronounced arterial vasodilatation in cirrhotics with tense ascites can be prevented by the infusion of albumin, which is an expensive treatment modality. Various vasoconstrictors have also been used to prevent PICD, but there are few studies about the usage of midodrine.

Study: Fifty patients with cirrhosis and tense refractory ascites were randomly assigned to be treated with either midodrine (n=25) (12.5 mg 3 times/d; over 3 d) or albumin (n=25) (8 g/L of removed ascites) after a large-volume paracentesis. Effective arterial blood volume was assessed indirectly by measuring serum creatinine, serum sodium, plasma renin activity, and aldosterone concentration before and 6 days after paracentesis.

Results: Midodrine therapy was cheaper compared with albumin therapy, but serum creatinine, serum sodium, plasma renin activity, and plasma aldosterone concentration values after treatment [0.99±0.19 to 3.02±2.58 mg/dL (P=0.001), 132.36±3.2 to 130.2±4.1 mEq/L (P<0.001), 3.03±0.33 to 4.2±0.76 ng/mL/h (P<0.001), and 166.72±64.26 to 298.64±130 pg/mL (P<0.001), respectively] significantly differed in the midodrine group from that in the albumin group [1.10±0.22 to 1.11±0.161 mg/dL (P=0.885), 132.2±3.524 to 131.88±3.09 mEq/L (P=0.246), 4±0.91 to 4.11±0.74 ng/mL/h (P=0.440), and 204.88±115.9 to 177.08±100.5 pg/mL (P<0.001), respectively]. Seven patients, among whom 6 were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) positive, in the midodrine group of our study died as a consequence of liver failure complicated by acute renal failure, followed by hepatic encephalopathy. Whereas in the albumin group, even among the 7 patients with HCC, no patient died or developed hepatorenal syndrome or developed hepatic encephalopathy.

Conclusions: This pilot study suggests that midodrine is not as effective as intravenous albumin in preventing circulatory dysfunction after large-volume paracentesis in patients with cirrhosis and tense ascites, especially with HCC-positive patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Midodrine for paracentesis-induced circulatory dysfunction.
    Bai M, Han G. Bai M, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;48(3):300. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182a8bfaf. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24100756 No abstract available.
  • In response.
    Elbaz AA; Co-Authors. Elbaz AA, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;48(3):300-1. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000003. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24202000 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources