Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul-Aug;33(4):E149-52.
doi: 10.1148/rg.334125123.

Interactive case review of radiologic and pathologic findings from breast biopsy: are they concordant? How do I manage the results?

Affiliations

Interactive case review of radiologic and pathologic findings from breast biopsy: are they concordant? How do I manage the results?

Christopher P Ho et al. Radiographics. 2013 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

The number of imaging-guided percutaneous breast biopsies performed has steadily increased as imaging techniques have improved. Percutaneous biopsy is becoming more commonplace and supplanting excisional biopsy as the preferred diagnostic tool. The radiologist's role in caring for patients who undergo breast biopsy extends beyond imaging to identifying lesions for biopsy and then performing the procedure. Radiologists must also be cognizant of radiologic-pathologic correlation to determine whether biopsy results are concordant with imaging findings and make management recommendations. Management of microcalcifications, masses, and areas of asymmetry begins with recognizing and characterizing the findings with the proper Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. Determining concordance between imaging findings and histologic results is equally important. The decision to recommend surgical excision or short-term follow-up relies heavily on whether the histologic diagnosis correlates with the imaging findings, a determination that is part of the radiologist's responsibilities if he or she performs the biopsy. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/rg.334125123/-/DC1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vandromme MJ, Umphrey H, Krontiras H. Image-guided methods for biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. J Surg Oncol 2011;103(4):299–305. - PubMed
    1. Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Launders J, Schoelles K. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med 2010;152(4):238–246. - PubMed
    1. Bent CK, Bassett LW, D’Orsi CJ, Sayre JW. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(5):1378–1383. - PubMed
    1. Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, et al. . Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics 2010;30(5):1183–1198. - PubMed
    1. Burnside ES, Ochsner J, Fowler K, et al. . Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Radiology 2007; 242(2):388–395. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources