Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Jul 2;8(7):e67083.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067083. Print 2013.

The use of biatain Ag in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The use of biatain Ag in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

David Leaper et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Venous leg ulcers are common, troublesome, and their failure to heal is often related to a heavy bio-burden. Ionized silver has both anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties. The ulcer healing properties of the silver releasing foam dressing Biatain Ag has been examined in 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Aim: To evaluate ulcer healing through a meta-analytic approach after treatment with either Biatain Ag or a non-active dressing.

Patients and methods: 685 subjects with pure or mixed hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers were included in the meta-analysis.

Results: Biatain Ag showed a significant treatment effect (p<0.0001), responder rate (p<0.001), and healing rate (p = 0.002).

Conclusion: The meta-analysis of the 4 RCTs provided statistical significant evidence to support the use of Biatain Ag dressing in treatment of hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: BPJ is an employee of Coloplast A/S, who funded this study. The authors are occasionally used as KOLs for advisory boards at Coloplast A/S. Larix Aps, Denmark conducted the statistical analysis. Trial Form Support Aps, Denmark contributed with medical writing of the manuscript. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Forest plot showing the estimated treatment differences defined by percentage relative reduction.
The solid vertical line represents a treatment difference of zero. The confidence intervals (95%) are illustrated by the length of the horizontal lines. The sizes of the filled circles are adjusted to the size of the corresponding study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mekkes JR, Loots MA, van der Wal AC, Bos JD (2003) Causes, investigation and treatment of leg ulceration. Br J Dermatol 148: 388–401. - PubMed
    1. Baker SR, Stacey MC, Singh G, Hoskin SE, Thompson PJ (1992) Aetiology of chronic leg ulcers. Eur J Vasc Surg 6: 245–251. - PubMed
    1. Cornwall JV, Dore CJ, Lewis JD (1986) Leg ulcers: epidemiology and aetiology. Br J Surg 73: 693–696. - PubMed
    1. Margolis DJ, Bilker W, Santanna J, Baumgarten M (2002) Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol 46: 381–386. - PubMed
    1. Ayello EA, Cuddigan JE (2004) Conquer chronic wounds with wound bed preparation. Nurse Pract 29: 8–25. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources