Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Nov;36(11):3388-95.
doi: 10.2337/dc12-1853. Epub 2013 Jul 11.

Benchmarking is associated with improved quality of care in type 2 diabetes: the OPTIMISE randomized, controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Benchmarking is associated with improved quality of care in type 2 diabetes: the OPTIMISE randomized, controlled trial

Michel P Hermans et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To assess prospectively the effect of benchmarking on quality of primary care for patients with type 2 diabetes by using three major modifiable cardiovascular risk factors as critical quality indicators.

Research design and methods: Primary care physicians treating patients with type 2 diabetes in six European countries were randomized to give standard care (control group) or standard care with feedback benchmarked against other centers in each country (benchmarking group). In both groups, laboratory tests were performed every 4 months. The primary end point was the percentage of patients achieving preset targets of the critical quality indicators HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) after 12 months of follow-up.

Results: Of 4,027 patients enrolled, 3,996 patients were evaluable and 3,487 completed 12 months of follow-up. Primary end point of HbA1c target was achieved in the benchmarking group by 58.9 vs. 62.1% in the control group (P = 0.398) after 12 months; 40.0 vs. 30.1% patients met the SBP target (P < 0.001); 54.3 vs. 49.7% met the LDL cholesterol target (P = 0.006). Percentages of patients meeting all three targets increased during the study in both groups, with a statistically significant increase observed in the benchmarking group. The percentage of patients achieving all three targets at month 12 was significantly larger in the benchmarking group than in the control group (12.5 vs. 8.1%; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, benchmarking was shown to be an effective tool for increasing achievement of critical quality indicators and potentially reducing patient cardiovascular residual risk profile.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00681850.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentages of patients reaching critical quality indicator targets at baseline and after 12 months of follow-up. A: HbA1c target <7.0% (<53.0 mmol/mol). B: SBP target <130 mmHg (<125 mmHg in patients with proteinuria). C: LDL cholesterol target <100 mg/dL (<80 mg/dL in Belgium; <70 mg/dL in patients with existing CHD). D: Percentages of patients reaching target for all three critical quality indicators.

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 5th edition [Internet], 2011. Brussels, International Diabetes Federation. Available from http://www.idf.org/diabetesatlas Accessed 12 December 2011
    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 4th edition [Internet], 2009. Brussels, International Diabetes Federation. Available from http://archive.diabetesatlas.org Accessed 12 December 2011
    1. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet 1998;352:837–853 - PubMed
    1. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. BMJ 1998;317:703–713 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turnbull F, Neal B, Algert C, et al. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1410–1419 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data