Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
- PMID: 23847265
- PMCID: PMC3710981
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002857
Comparing two types of macrolide antibiotics for the purpose of assessing population-based drug interactions
Abstract
Objective: Clarithromycin strongly inhibits enzyme cytochrome P450 3A4, preventing the metabolism of some other drugs, while azithromycin is a weak inhibitor. Accordingly, blood concentrations of other drugs increase with clarithromycin coprescription leading to adverse events. These macrolide antibiotics also differ on other properties that may impact outcomes. In this study, we compared outcomes in two groups of macrolide antibiotic users in the absence of potentially interacting drugs.
Design: Population-based retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2010.
Patients: Patients (mean 74 years) prescribed clarithromycin (n=52 251) or azithromycin (referent group, n=46 618).
Main outcomes: The primary outcomes were hospital admission within 30 days of a new antibiotic prescription with any of the 12 conditions examined separately (acute kidney injury, acute myocardial infarction, neuroimaging (proxy for delirium), hypotension, syncope, hyperkalaemia, hyponatraemia, hyperglycaemia, arrhythmia, ischaemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding and sepsis). The secondary outcome was mortality.
Results: The baseline characteristics of the two groups, including patient demographics, comorbid conditions, infection type and prescribing physician specialty, were nearly identical. The median daily dose was 1000 mg for clarithromycin and 300 mg for azithromycin and the median duration of dispensing antibiotics was 10 and 5 days, respectively. There was no difference between the groups in the risk of hospitalisation for any condition studied (relative risk ranged from 0.67 to 1.23). Compared with azithromycin, clarithromycin was associated with a slightly higher risk of all-cause mortality (0.46% vs 0.37%, relative risk 1.25, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.52).
Conclusions: Clarithromycin can be used to assess drug interactions in population-based studies with azithromycin serving as a control group. However, any differences in mortality observed between the two antibiotic groups in the setting of other drug use may be partially attributable to factors beyond the inhibition of drug metabolising enzymes and transporters, as the difference for this outcome was significant.
Keywords: Clinical Pharmacology; Preventive Medicine; Public Health.
Similar articles
-
Calcium-channel blocker-clarithromycin drug interactions and acute kidney injury.JAMA. 2013 Dec 18;310(23):2544-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282426. JAMA. 2013. PMID: 24346990
-
Adverse events with quetiapine and clarithromycin coprescription: A population-based retrospective cohort study.Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 23;6(6):e1375. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1375. eCollection 2023 Jun. Health Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37359413 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes Following Macrolide Use in Kidney Transplant Recipients.Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019 Feb 21;6:2054358119830706. doi: 10.1177/2054358119830706. eCollection 2019. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019. PMID: 30815270 Free PMC article.
-
Delirium associated with the use of macrolide antibiotics: a review.Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2022 Mar;26(1):29-42. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1828933. Epub 2020 Oct 7. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2022. PMID: 33026877 Review.
-
The new macrolide antibiotics: azithromycin, clarithromycin, dirithromycin, and roxithromycin.Ann Pharmacother. 1992 Jan;26(1):46-55. doi: 10.1177/106002809202600112. Ann Pharmacother. 1992. PMID: 1318761 Review.
Cited by
-
Risk of adverse events among older adults following co-prescription of clarithromycin and statins not metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4.CMAJ. 2015 Feb 17;187(3):174-180. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.140950. Epub 2014 Dec 22. CMAJ. 2015. PMID: 25534598 Free PMC article.
-
The Overview on the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions of Triazoles.Pharmaceutics. 2021 Nov 19;13(11):1961. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111961. Pharmaceutics. 2021. PMID: 34834376 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interactions in Pharmacoepidemiologic Research.Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70088. doi: 10.1002/pds.70088. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025. PMID: 39805810 Review.
-
A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict Potential Drug-Drug Interactions and Inform Dosing of Acumapimod, an Oral p38 MAPK Inhibitor.CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;10(1):30-39. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12565. Epub 2020 Dec 30. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 33107218 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Associations between Antibiotics for Non-tuberculous Mycobacterial Infection and Incident Sjögren's Syndrome: A Nationwide, Population-based Case-control Study.Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 30;8(1):16007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34495-4. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30375488 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dresser GK, Spence JD, Bailey DG. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic consequences and clinical relevance of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibition. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000;38:41–57 - PubMed
-
- Wilkinson GR. Drug metabolism and variability among patients in drug response. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2211–21 - PubMed
-
- Hutson JR, Fischer HD, Wang X, et al. Use of clarithromycin and adverse cardiovascular events among older patients receiving donepezil: a population-based, nested case-control study. Drugs Aging 2012;29:205–11 - PubMed
-
- Neuvonen PJ, Niemi M, Backman JT. Drug interactions with lipid-lowering drugs: mechanisms and clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006;80:565–81 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources