Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;100(4):1025-32.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.040. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States

Affiliations

Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States

Lawrence M Kessler et al. Fertil Steril. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the characteristics of women seeking infertility evaluation and treatment.

Design: Cross-sectional survey based on in-person interviews, followed by two-step hurdle analysis.

Setting: Not applicable.

Patient(s): 4,558 married or cohabitating women ages 25 to 44 years.

Intervention(s): None.

Main outcome measure(s): Likelihood of seeking a preliminary infertility evaluation and of seeking infertility treatment once evaluated, and the treatment type provided.

Result(s): Of 623 women (13.7%) who reported seeking an infertility evaluation, 328 reported undergoing subsequent infertility treatment. Age at marriage, marital status, education, health insurance status, race/ethnicity, and religion were associated with the likelihood of seeking infertility evaluation. For example, the predicted probability that a non-white woman who married at age 25 will seek evaluation was 12%. This probability increased to 34% for white women with a graduate degree who had married at age 30. Among women who were evaluated, income, employment status, and ethnicity correlated strongly with the likelihood of seeking infertility treatment. Infertility drug therapy was the most frequent treatment used, and reproductive surgery and in vitro fertilization (IVF) were used the least often.

Conclusion(s): The use of infertility services is not random. Understanding the sociodemographic factors correlated with use may assist new couples with family planning. Roughly 50% of the women evaluated for infertility progressed to treatment, and only a small proportion were treated with more advanced assisted reproductive technologies such as in vitro fertilization. Future research aimed at improving access to effective health-care treatments within the boundaries of affordability is warranted.

Keywords: Assisted reproduction; family planning; infertility; infertility evaluation; infertility treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. [Accessed at July 26, 2012];Quick Facts About Infertility. (Available at http://www.asrm.org/detail.aspx?id=2322.
    1. Chandra A, Martinez G, Mosher W, Abma J, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. National Center for Health Statistics Vital Health Stat. 2005:1–160. - PubMed
    1. Chandra A, Stephen EH. Infertility service use among US women: 1995 and 2002. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:725–36. - PubMed
    1. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000;32:132–7. - PubMed
    1. Wilcox L, Mosher WD. Use of infertility services in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:122–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms