Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;79(18):5728-34.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01030-13. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

Transfer efficiency of bacteria and viruses from porous and nonporous fomites to fingers under different relative humidity conditions

Affiliations

Transfer efficiency of bacteria and viruses from porous and nonporous fomites to fingers under different relative humidity conditions

Gerardo U Lopez et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Fomites can serve as routes of transmission for both enteric and respiratory pathogens. The present study examined the effect of low and high relative humidity on fomite-to-finger transfer efficiency of five model organisms from several common inanimate surfaces (fomites). Nine fomites representing porous and nonporous surfaces of different compositions were studied. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus thuringiensis, MS2 coliphage, and poliovirus 1 were placed on fomites in 10-μl drops and allowed to dry for 30 min under low (15% to 32%) or high (40% to 65%) relative humidity. Fomite-to-finger transfers were performed using 1.0 kg/cm(2) of pressure for 10 s. Transfer efficiencies were greater under high relative humidity for both porous and nonporous surfaces. Most organisms on average had greater transfer efficiencies under high relative humidity than under low relative humidity. Nonporous surfaces had a greater transfer efficiency (up to 57%) than porous surfaces (<6.8%) under low relative humidity, as well as under high relative humidity (nonporous, up to 79.5%; porous, <13.4%). Transfer efficiency also varied with fomite material and organism type. The data generated can be used in quantitative microbial risk assessment models to assess the risk of infection from fomite-transmitted human pathogens and the relative levels of exposure to different types of fomites and microorganisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Haas CN, Rose JB, Gerba CP. 1999. Quantitative microbial risk assessment. John Wiley, New York, NY
    1. Hall CB, Douglas JRG. 1981. Modes of transmission of respiratory syncytial virus. J. Pediatr. 99:100–103 - PubMed
    1. Hall CB, Douglas RG, Jr, Schnabel KC, Geiman JM. 1981. Infectivity of respiratory syncytial virus by various routes of inoculation. Infect. Immun. 33:779–783 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hendley JO, Wenzel RP, Gwaltney JM. 1973. Transmission of rhinovirus colds by self-inoculation. N. Engl. J. Med. 288:1361–1364 - PubMed
    1. Nicas M, Sun G. 2006. An integrated model of infection risk in a health-care environment. Risk Anal. 26:1085–1096 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources