Women's ability to self-screen for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive pills in Tanzanian drug shops
- PMID: 23859705
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.024
Women's ability to self-screen for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive pills in Tanzanian drug shops
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive pills (COCs) and to estimate the proportion of women with contraindications to hormonal methods among those using drug shops in Tanzania.
Methods: Trained nurses interviewed 1651 women aged 18-39 years who self-screened for contraindications to COCs with the help of a poster at drug shops in Tanzania. Nurse assessment of the women served as the gold standard for comparison with self-assessment. Blood pressure was also measured onsite.
Results: Nurses reported that 437 (26.5%) women were not eligible to use COCs, compared with 485 (29.4%) according to self-report. Overall, 133 (8.1%) women who said that they were eligible were deemed ineligible by nurses. The rate of ineligibility was artificially high owing to participant and nurse assessments that were incorrectly based on adverse effects of pill use and cultural reasons, and because of the sampling procedure, which intercepted women regardless of their reasons for visiting the drug shop. Adjusted rates of ineligibility were 8.6% and 12.7%, respectively, according to nurse and participant assessment. Both nurses and women underestimated the prevalence of hypertension in the present group.
Conclusion: Self-screening among women in rural and peri-urban Tanzania with regard to contraindications to COC use was comparable to assessment by trained nurses.
Keywords: Combined oral contraceptive pills; Contraindications; Hormonal contraception; Injectable contraception; Oral contraceptives; Over-the-counter status; Self-screening.
© 2013.
Similar articles
-
Women's knowledge of taking oral contraceptive pills correctly and of emergency contraception: effect of providing information leaflets in general practice.Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Aug;45(397):409-14. Br J Gen Pract. 1995. PMID: 7576845 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive use.Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep;112(3):572-8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818345f0. Obstet Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18757654 Free PMC article.
-
[Oral contraceptives: knowledge and compliance].Ugeskr Laeger. 1993 Nov 1;155(44):3546-50. Ugeskr Laeger. 1993. PMID: 8236575 Danish.
-
Over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives as a reproductive healthcare strategy.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Dec;25(6):500-5. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000019. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 24121600 Review.
-
Estrogen-free oral hormonal contraception: benefits of the progestin-only pill.Womens Health (Lond). 2010 Sep;6(5):721-35. doi: 10.2217/whe.10.36. Womens Health (Lond). 2010. PMID: 21080791 Review.
Cited by
-
"I was told it was the pill that suits me": A qualitative study of women's perceptions and experiences of medical reasons for non-preferred contraceptive use.Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251358983. doi: 10.1177/17455057251358983. Epub 2025 Jul 28. Womens Health (Lond). 2025. PMID: 40726097 Free PMC article.
-
Getting closer to people: family planning provision by drug shops in Uganda.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Nov 13;2(4):472-81. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-14-00085. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014. PMID: 25611480 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources