Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Dec;29(12):1267-71.
doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3342-4. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

On-Q ® pain pump versus epidural for postoperative analgesia in children

Affiliations
Comparative Study

On-Q ® pain pump versus epidural for postoperative analgesia in children

Elizabeth M Pontarelli et al. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: The On-Q(®) pain pump provides a continuous infusion of local anesthesia for management of postoperative pain. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and outcomes of the On-Q(®) pump compared to continuous epidural in children postoperatively.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients in our hospital who received a postoperative epidural or On-Q(®) pump from 2005 to 2008. Patients were sub-categorized by incision type.

Results: Seventy patients received epidural and 66 On-Q(®). On-Q(®) therapy was longer by 1 day (p < 0.0001), but did not affect postoperative length of stay. Patients with On-Q(®) pumps had a decreased rate of Foley catheter placement (p = 0.002) and shorter duration of catheter use by more than a day (p < 0.001). Moderate to severe pain was similar in the two groups on postoperative days 0-5. Supplemental narcotic use was higher in the On-Q(®) group only on postoperative day 1 (p = 0.005) and in patients with midline and transverse abdominal incisions. No differences were seen in time to ambulation or recovery of postoperative ileus.

Conclusion: The On-Q(®) pain pump is an effective method for postoperative pain control, without the inherent risks of epidural catheters.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Feb;202(2):297-305 - PubMed
    1. Br J Anaesth. 1982 May;54(5):479-86 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):55-63 - PubMed
    1. Anaesthesia. 1985 Nov;40(11):1086-92 - PubMed
    1. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):576-80 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources