Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul 4;8(7):e67916.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067916. Print 2013.

Looking ahead: anticipatory gaze and motor ability in infancy

Affiliations

Looking ahead: anticipatory gaze and motor ability in infancy

Ettore Ambrosini et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The present study asks when infants are able to selectively anticipate the goals of observed actions, and how this ability relates to infants' own abilities to produce those specific actions. Using eye-tracking technology to measure on-line anticipation, 6-, 8- and 10-month-old infants and a control group of adults were tested while observing an adult reach with a whole hand grasp, a precision grasp or a closed fist towards one of two different sized objects. The same infants were also given a comparable action production task. All infants showed proactive gaze to the whole hand grasps, with increased degrees of proactivity in the older groups. Gaze proactivity to the precision grasps, however, was present from 8 months of age. Moreover, the infants' ability in performing precision grasping strongly predicted their ability in using the actor's hand shape cues to differentially anticipate the goal of the observed action, even when age was partialled out. The results are discussed in terms of the specificity of action anticipation, and the fine-grained relationship between action production and action perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors confirm that coauthor CS is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member and that this does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Snapshots of stimulus videos.
The figure shows the hand movement kinematic for the two targets layouts (panel A and B) in each experimental condition (for each panel, from top to bottom: No Shape–Small Target, Pre-Shape–Small Target, No Shape–Large Target and Pre-Shape–Large Target). The leftmost column depicts the Fixation phase with the Target AOI (white circle) superimposed on the target object. The central columns show the actor’s hand during the Movement phase for the frames corresponding to each quartile of the movement, and the column corresponding to the 100% of the Movement phase shows the actual end of the action, i.e., the last frame of the actual video. The rightmost column depicts the Contact phase. The person depicted in this figure has given written informed consent, as outlined in the PLoS consent form, to publication of their photograph.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Gaze arrival times.
Time of gaze arrival at the Target relative to arrival of actor's hand. Gaze arrival times are plotted as a function of Target size and hand Shape in each Age group. Actor's hand-arrival time is represented by the horizontal line at 0 ms. Negative values represents proactive eye movements. Error bars represents within-subjects standard errors. * indicates p<.05.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relation between infants' gaze proactivity and motor ability.
Performances in grasping and observation tasks in Small and Large conditions (see Methods) are plotted as green diamonds and blue circles, respectively. Corresponding regression lines are shown as green and blue solid lines.

References

    1. Marshall PJ, Meltzoff AN (2011) Neural mirroring systems: Exploring the EEG mu rhythm in human infancy. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 1: 110–123. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meltzoff AN, Williamson RA, Marshall PJ (2013) Developmental perspectives on action science: Lessons from infant imitation and cognitive neuroscience. In: Prinz W, Beisert M, Herwig A, editors. Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline. Cambridge: MIT press. 281–306.
    1. Baldwin D, Andersson A, Saffran J, Meyer M (2008) Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure. Cognition 106: 1382–1407. - PubMed
    1. Corbetta D, Thelen E, Johnson K (2000) Motor constraints on the development of perception-action matching in infant reaching. Amsterdam, ETATS-UNIS: Elsevier.
    1. Gibson EJ, Pick AD (2000) An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development.

Publication types