Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Oct;51(10):3183-91.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.00860-13. Epub 2013 Jul 17.

Comparison of Xpert MRSA/SA Nasal and MRSA/SA ELITe MGB assays for detection of the mecA gene with susceptibility testing methods for determination of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of Xpert MRSA/SA Nasal and MRSA/SA ELITe MGB assays for detection of the mecA gene with susceptibility testing methods for determination of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Mohamed Belmekki et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

In a series of 82 Staphylococcus strains isolated from culture, 100% were identified as Staphylococcus aureus by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS); 99.9% (77/82) of them were resistant to benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, and cefoxitin, and 6.1% (5/82) were susceptible to methicillin. Xpert MRSA/SA assay results were concordant with the phenotypic results in 76.8% (63/82) of cases and discordant in 23.2% (19/82) of cases. The MRSA/SA ELITe MGB kit results were concordant with phenotypic results in 100% of the cases. When comparing the Xpert MRSA/SA assay results with the MRSA/SA ELITe MGB kit results, 78% (64/82) of the cases were concordant, while 22% (18/82) of the cases were discordant. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two techniques. The PCR protocol that was used to validate the results of these two methods gave the following results: 49 were conventional methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates (mecA positive and mecALGA251 negative), and 25 were phenotypic MRSA isolates (mecA negative and mecALGA251 positive).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Amplification data obtained with Xpert MRSA/SA assay for 5 of 81 MRSA phenotypes. Shown are a typical MRSA (spa+ mecA+ SCCmec+) (a), false-negative MRSA (spa+ mecA+ CT39 SCCmec) (b), spa+ mecA+ SCCmec (c), spa+ mecA SCCmec+ (d), and spa+ mecA SCCmec (e) genotypes.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Amplification data obtained with MRSA/SA ELITe MGB kit. Shown are a CT of −5.37 and a ΔCT of >2, indicating MRSA (a), a CT of less than −5.27 and a ΔCT of >2, indicating MSSA or the presence of two bacteria (the target DNA was incorrectly detected) (b), and a CT of −0.49 and a ΔCT value of <2, indicating MSSA (c).
Fig 3
Fig 3
PCR for detection of 16S-23S of the rRNA gene, mecALGA251 (primers MFP and MRP), mecA (primers P4 and P7), and mecALGA251 (primers FP and RP). Lanes 1 and 6, 100- and 3,000-bp ladder; lane 2, 16S-23S spacer region of the rRNA gene; lane 3, mecALGA251 (primers MFP and MRP); lane 4, mecALGA251 (primers FP to RP); lane 5, mecA (primers P4 and P7).

References

    1. Ito T, Katayama Y, Hiramatsu K. 1999. Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1449–1458 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deurenberg RH, Stobberingh EE. 2008. The evolution of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Genet. Evol. 8:747–763 - PubMed
    1. Huletsky A, Giroux R, Rossbach V, Gagnon M, Vaillancourt M, Bernier M, Gagnon F, Truchon K, Bastien M, Picard FJ, van Belkum A, Ouellette M, Roy PH, Bergeron MG. 2004. New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:1875–1884 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chongtrakool P, Ito T, Ma XX, Kondo Y, Trakeulsomboon S, Tiensensitorn C, Jamklang M, Chavalit T, Song JH, Hiramatsu K. 2006. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in 11 Asian countries: a proposal for a new nomenclature for SCCmec elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1001–1012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements (IWG-SCC) 2009. Classification of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for reporting novel SCCmec elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53:4961–4967 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances