Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;103(9):1700-7.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301166. Epub 2013 Jul 18.

Social media adoption in local health departments nationwide

Affiliations

Social media adoption in local health departments nationwide

Jenine K Harris et al. Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined whether characteristics of local health departments (LHD) and their geographic region were associated with using Facebook and Twitter. We also examined the number of tweets per month for Twitter accounts as an indicator of social media use by LHDs.

Methods: In 2012, we searched for Facebook and Twitter accounts for 2565 LHDs nationwide, and collected adoption date and number of connections for each account. Number of tweets sent indicated LHD use of social media. LHDs were classified as innovators, early adopters, or nonadopters. Characteristics of LHDs were compared across adoption categories, and we examined geographic characteristics, connections, and use.

Results: Twenty-four percent of LHDs had Facebook, 8% had Twitter, and 7% had both. LHDs serving larger populations were more likely to be innovators, tweeted more often, and had more social media connections. Frequency of tweeting was not associated with adoption category. There were differences in adoption across geographic regions, with western states more likely to be innovators. Innovation was also higher in states where the state health department adopted social media.

Conclusions: Social media has the potential to aid LHDs in disseminating information across the public health system. More evidence is needed to develop best practices for this emerging tool.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Adoption of Twitter and Facebook over time among local health departments: United States, 2012.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Geographic distribution among local health departments nationwide of (a) Twitter and (b) Facebook: United States, 2012.
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Number of likes and followers for early and late adopters with and without a public information specialist: United States, 2012.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Public Health Performance Standards Program (NPHPSP). 10 Essential public health services. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nphpsp/essentialServices.html. Accessed July 9, 2012.
    1. Public Health Accreditation Board. Standards and measures. 2011. Available at: http://www.phaboard.org/accreditation-process/public-health-department-s.... Accessed June 8, 2012.
    1. Mays GP, McHugh MC, Shim K et al. Getting what you pay for: public health spending and the performance of essential public health services. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004;10(5):435–443. - PubMed
    1. Schein R, Wilson K, Keelan J. Literature review on effectiveness of the use of social media: a report for Peel public health. Peel Public Health. 2010. Available at: http://www.peelregion.ca/health/resources/pdf/socialmedia.pdf. Accessed June 8, 2012.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The health communicator’s social media toolkit. 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/Tools/guidelines/pdf/SocialMediaToolkit_B.... Accessed June 8, 2012.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources