Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study
- PMID: 23867211
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70277-8
Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study
Abstract
Background: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a very rare, aggressive, and progressive osteolytic tumour for which no standard medicinal treatment or chemotherapy exists. We report interim safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study of denosumab in patients with GCTB.
Methods: We did an international, open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 trial of patients with histologically confirmed GCTB and radiographically measurable active disease. Eligible patients were adults or skeletally mature adolescents with radiographic evidence of at least one mature long bone who were at least 12 years old and weighed at least 45 kg. We divided patients into three cohorts--those with surgically unsalvageable GCTB (cohort 1), those with salvageable GCTB whose surgery was associated with severe morbidity (cohort 2), and those who transferred from a previous study of denosumab for GCTB (cohort 3). Patients in cohorts 1 and 2 received 120 mg of subcutaneous denosumab every 4 weeks with loading doses on days 8 and 15 of the first cycle; those in cohort 3 continued the regimen from the previous study. Investigator-determined disease status and clinical benefit were assessed every 4 weeks. Our primary endpoint was the safety profile of denosumab in terms of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. Prespecified secondary endpoints were time to disease progression in cohort 1 and the proportion of patients without any surgery at 6 months in cohort 2. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of denosumab. Efficacy analyses included all eligible patients who received at least one dose of denosumab. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT00680992.
Findings: 282 patients, including ten adolescents, were included between Sept 9, 2008, and March 25, 2011. Of the 281 patients analysable for safety, three (1%) had osteonecrosis of the jaw and 15 (5%) hypocalcaemia. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypophosphataemia, which occurred in nine (3%) patients, and anaemia, back pain, and pain in extremities, each of which occurred in three patients (1%). Serious adverse events were reported in 25 (9%) patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. On the basis of investigators' assessment of disease status, 163 of 169 (96%) analysable patients in cohort 1 had no disease progression after median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 5·8-21·0). In cohort 2, 74 of 100 (74%) analysable patients had no surgery and 16 of 26 (62%) patients who had surgery underwent a less morbid procedure than planned. Median follow-up in cohort 2 was 9·2 months (IQR 4·2-12·9).
Interpretation: Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of denosumab. Denosumab was associated with tumour responses and reduced the need for morbid surgery in patients with GCTB. Denosumab represents a new treatment option for patients with GCTB.
Funding: Amgen.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Denosumab treatment of giant cell tumour of bone.Lancet Oncol. 2013 Aug;14(9):801-2. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70291-2. Epub 2013 Jul 16. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23867210 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 study.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1719-1729. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30663-1. Epub 2019 Nov 6. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31704134 Clinical Trial.
-
Denosumab in advanced/unresectable giant-cell tumour of bone (GCTB): For how long?Eur J Cancer. 2017 May;76:118-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Mar 17. Eur J Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28324746
-
Denosumab Treatment for Giant Cell Tumor of the Spine Including the Sacrum.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Mar 1;46(5):277-284. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003728. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021. PMID: 33038190 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Denosumab: a new treatment option for giant cell tumor of bone.Drugs Today (Barc). 2013 Nov;49(11):693-700. doi: 10.1358/dot.2013.49.11.2064725. Drugs Today (Barc). 2013. PMID: 24308016 Review.
-
Preoperative Denosumab plus Surgery in the Management of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Comprehensive Narrative Literature Review.Gulf J Oncolog. 2019 May;1(30):67-75. Gulf J Oncolog. 2019. PMID: 31242985 Review.
Cited by
-
Malignant Transformation of Giant Cell Tumour of Bone: A Review of Literature and the Experience of a Referral Centre.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Sep 14;23(18):10721. doi: 10.3390/ijms231810721. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36142631 Free PMC article. Review.
-
p62 overexpression promotes neoplastic stromal cell proliferation and is associated with the recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone.Oncol Lett. 2020 Oct;20(4):86. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11947. Epub 2020 Aug 5. Oncol Lett. 2020. PMID: 32863919 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Treatment Modalities for Reducing Recurrence in Central Giant Cell Granuloma: A Narrative Review.Dent J (Basel). 2024 Sep 19;12(9):295. doi: 10.3390/dj12090295. Dent J (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39329860 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Severe hypercalcemia following denosumab treatment in a juvenile patient.J Bone Miner Metab. 2016 Jan;34(1):118-22. doi: 10.1007/s00774-015-0677-z. Epub 2015 Jun 9. J Bone Miner Metab. 2016. PMID: 26056018
-
Clinicopathological Features of a Series of 27 Cases of Post-Denosumab Treated Giant Cell Tumors of Bones: A Single Institutional Experience at a Tertiary Cancer Referral Centre, India.Pathol Oncol Res. 2017 Jan;23(1):157-164. doi: 10.1007/s12253-016-0123-0. Epub 2016 Oct 8. Pathol Oncol Res. 2017. PMID: 27722984
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical