Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun;21(3):411-20.
doi: 10.1007/s12529-013-9329-7.

Subjective health complaints and self-rated health: are expectancies more important than socioeconomic status and workload?

Eline Ree  1 , Magnus Odeen, Hege R Eriksen, Aage Indahl, Camilla Ihlebæk, Jørn Hetland, Anette Harris
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Subjective health complaints and self-rated health: are expectancies more important than socioeconomic status and workload?

Eline Ree et al. Int J Behav Med. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The associations between socioeconomic status (SES), physical and psychosocial workload and health are well documented. According to The Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress (CATS), learned response outcome expectancies (coping, helplessness, and hopelessness) are also important contributors to health. This is in part as independent factors for health, but coping may also function as a buffer against the impact different demands have on health.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative effect of SES (as measured by level of education), physical workload, and response outcome expectancies on subjective health complaints (SHC) and self-rated health, and if response outcome expectancies mediate the effects of education and physical workload on SHC and self-rated health.

Methods: A survey was carried out among 1,746 Norwegian municipal employees (mean age 44.2, 81 % females). Structural Equation Models with SHC and self-rated health as outcomes were conducted. Education, physical workload, and response outcome expectancies, were the independent 28 variables in the model.

Results: Helplessness/hopelessness had a stronger direct effect on self-rated health and SHC than education and physical workload, for both men and women. Helplessness/hopelessness fully mediated the effect of physical workload on SHC for men (0.121), and mediated 30 % of a total effect of 0.247 for women. For women, education had a small but significant indirect effect through helplessness/hopelessness on self-rated health (0.040) and SHC (-0.040), but no direct effects were found. For men, there was no effect of education on SHC, and only a direct effect on self-rated health (0.134).

Conclusions: The results indicated that helplessness/hopelessness is more important for SHC and health than well-established measures on SES such as years of education and perceived physical workload in this sample. Helplessness/hopelessness seems to function as a mechanism between physical workload and health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Parameter estimates for final model in women. The circles represent latent variables. The squares represent observed variables. All path coefficients are significant at p < 0.01
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Parameter estimates for final model in men. The circles represent latent variables. The squares represent observed variables. All path coefficients are significant at p < 0.01
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adler NE, Boyce T, Chesney MA, Cohen S, Folkman S, Kahn RL, et al. Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. Am Psychol. 1994;49(1):15–24. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.49.1.15. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torgersen TP, Giæver Ø, Stigen OT. Developing an intersectoral national strategy to reduce social inequalities in health. The Norwegian Case. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of Health and Social Affairs; 2007.
    1. Kunst AE, Bos V, Lahelma E, Bartley M, Lissau I, Regidor AM, et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in self-assessed health in 10 European countries. 34. 2005:295–305. - PubMed
    1. Van Lenthe FJ, Schrijvers CTM, Droomers M, Joung IMA, Louwman MJ, Mackenbach JP. Investigating explanations of socio-economic inequalities in health. The Dutch GLOBE study. Eur J Public Health. 2004;14:63–70. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.1.63. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eriksen HR, Ihlebæk C, Ursin H. A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC) Scand J Public Health. 1999;1:63–72. doi: 10.1177/14034948990270010401. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms