Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Aug 1;119 Suppl 15(0 15):2926-39.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.28166.

Developmental milestones across the programmatic life cycle: implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Developmental milestones across the programmatic life cycle: implementing the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program

Rebecca Glover-Kudon et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: In 2005 through 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded 5 sites to implement a colorectal cancer screening program for uninsured, low-income populations. These 5 sites composed a demonstration project intended to explore the feasibility of establishing a national colorectal cancer screening program through various service delivery models.

Methods: A longitudinal, multiple case study was conducted to understand and document program implementation processes. Using metaphor as a qualitative analytic technique, evaluators identified stages of maturation across the programmatic life cycle.

Results: Analysis rendered a working theory of program development during screening implementation. In early stages, program staff built relationships with CDC and local partners around screening readiness, faced real-world challenges putting program policies into practice, revised initial program designs, and developed new professional skills. Midterm implementation was defined by establishing program cohesiveness and expanding programmatic reach. In later stages of implementation, staff focused on sustainability and formal program closeout, which prompted reflection about personal and programmatic accomplishments.

Conclusions: Demonstration sites evolved through common developmental stages during screening implementation. Findings elucidate ways to target technical assistance to more efficiently move programs along their maturation trajectory. In practical terms, the time and cost associated with guiding a program to maturity may be potentially shortened to maximize return on investment for both organizations and clients receiving service benefits.

Keywords: colorectal cancer screening; multiple case study; program development; program evaluation; program implementation; qualitative methods; technical assistance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE

The authors made no disclosure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality--United States, 2002–2010. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:884–889. - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Accessed November 4, 2011];Colorectal cancer screening rates--prevention and early detection: keys to reducing deaths. http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/screening_rates.htm. Posted 2011.
    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–1981. - PubMed
    1. Healthy People 2020. [Accessed March 31, 2012];US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. http://healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx.
    1. Rim SH, Joseph DA, Steele CB, Thompson TD, Seeff LC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Colorectal cancer screening -- United States, 2002, 2004, 2006, and 2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011;60(suppl):42–46. - PubMed

Publication types