Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 1;119 Suppl 15(Suppl 15):2940-6.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.28155.

Moving forward: using the experience of the CDCs' Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program to guide future colorectal cancer programming efforts

Affiliations

Moving forward: using the experience of the CDCs' Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program to guide future colorectal cancer programming efforts

Laura C Seeff et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established and supported a 4-year Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program (CRCSDP) from 2005 to 2009 for low-income, under- or uninsured men and women aged 50-64 at 5 sites in the United States.

Methods: A multiple methods evaluation was conducted including 1) a longitudinal, comparative case study of program implementation, 2) the collection and analysis of client-level screening and diagnostic services outcome data, and 3) the collection and analysis of program- and patient-level cost data.

Results: Several themes emerged from the results reported in the series of articles in this Supplement. These included the benefit of building on an existing infrastructure, strengths and weakness of both the 2 most frequently used screening tests (colonoscopy and fecal occult blood tests), variability in costs of maintaining this screening program, and the importance of measuring the quality of screening tests. Population-level evaluation questions could not be answered because of the small size of the participating population and the limited time frame of the evaluation. The comprehensive evaluation of the program determined overall feasibility of this effort.

Conclusions: Critical lessons learned through the implementation and evaluation of the CDC's CRCSDP led to the development of a larger population-based program, the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).

Keywords: colonoscopy; colorectal cancer screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seeff LC, Rohan EA. Lessons Learned from CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Cancer. In press; Supplement. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seeff LC, Royalty J, Helsel WE, Kammerer WG, Boehm JE et al. Clinical outcomes of the federally-funded colorectal cancer screening demonstration program. Cancer. In press; Supplement.
    1. Nadel MR, Royalty J, Shapiro JA, Joseph DA, Seeff LC et al. Assessing screening quality in CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Cancer. In press; Supplement. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castro G, Azrak F, Seeff LC, Royalty J. Outpatient colonoscopy complications in CDC’s Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program: A prospective analysis. Cancer. In press; Supplement. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lane DS, Messina CR, Cavanagh MF, Anderson JC. Delivering colonoscopy screening for low-income populations in Suffolk County: Strategies, outcomes and benchmarks. Cancer. In press; Supplement. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources