[Efficacy and safety of a salsobromoiodic gel solution in proctological surgery]

Abstract

Background: Surgical procedures for ano-rectal pathologies are always conditioned by an high percentage of side-effects. Indeed, the prevention of probable complications such as the non tissue-recovery or infection is a fundamental topic to guarantee an adequate follow-up. The aim of this comparative study is to assess the short-term outcomes of the use of a solution salsobromoiodic gel solution in postoperative period of patients undergoing proctological surgery.

Materials and methods: The authors selected retrospectively a population of 80 patients, undergoing surgery for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Based on the recommended medications postoperatively, patients were divided into two groups: the Group A applied the salsobromoiodic solution gel on the perianal surgical wound in the postoperative period, the Group B did not use any medical facility with the exception of a soap at neutral pH. The clinical features assessed at 5, 10, 15 and 30 days after surgery were: pain, burning and itching lenght, the healing time, the presence or absence of early or late superinfection, the time of re-epithelization, the need for surgical curettage. The subjective evaluation of quality of life was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Results: There was a statistically significant reduction in length of postoperative pain in patients of Group A compared to Group B (5.6 vs 10.4 days respectively; p<0.005). There was a more rapid wound healing and re-epithelialization in group A, 15 and 21,3 days, respectively, as compared to Group B, 22.9 and 31.7 days (p<0.005). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of burning, itching and early and late bacterial infection. Two patients in Group B required a surgical debridement of the wound. Patients who used postoperatively salsobromoiodic solution declared a better quality of life.

Conclusions: The use of salsobromoiodic gel solution in the postoperative proctological surgery, resulted safe and was effective in reducing postoperative pain, in contributing wounds healing and improving the quality of life, as subjectively assessed by each patient.